Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 670 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.3 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| ![]() | Nvidia GeForce GTX 670GPUBoss Winner |
| |||||||
Higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Significantly lower TDP | 60W | vs | 170W | 2.8x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 29,150 | vs | 5,378 | Around 5.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 31,610 | vs | 20,401 | Around 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Better PassMark score | 5,374 | vs | 3,699 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 59.9 fps | vs | 20.4 fps | Around 3x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 40 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,400 MHz | More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | vs | 1,728 GFLOPS | More than 40% better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 55 | vs | 20.4 | Around 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 640 | 704 more shading units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 83.7 fps | vs | 46.7 fps | Around 80% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better cloud gate factor score | 20.91 | vs | 17.81 | More than 15% better cloud gate factor score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 25.62 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 55% higher pixel rate | |||
Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 82.64 GTexel/s | Around 25% higher texture rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Better video composition score | 69.27 frames/s | vs | 51.74 frames/s | Around 35% better video composition score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,578 | vs | 1,830 | More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score |
GeForce GTX 750 Ti | vs | 670 | ||
![]() | 9.0 | 9.7 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $274 | |
660 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
760 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R7 260X vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
950 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||