GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 670 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 670 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 670GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 60W | vs | 170W | 2.8x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 29,150 | vs | 5,378 | Around 5.5x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 86.4 GB/s | Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 31,610 | vs | 20,401 | Around 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 5,374 | vs | 3,699 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 59.9 fps | vs | 20.4 fps | Around 3x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 40 | 72 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,400 MHz | More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | vs | 1,728 GFLOPS | More than 40% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 55 | vs | 20.4 | Around 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 640 | 704 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 83.7 fps | vs | 46.7 fps | Around 80% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Better cloud gate factor score | 20.91 | vs | 17.81 | More than 15% better cloud gate factor score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 25.62 GPixel/s | vs | 16.32 GPixel/s | More than 55% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102.5 GTexel/s | vs | 82.64 GTexel/s | Around 25% higher texture rate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better video composition score | 69.27 frames/s | vs | 51.74 frames/s | Around 35% better video composition score | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,578 | vs | 1,830 | More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 670
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 4
Crysis 3
Reviews Word on the street
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $274 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 760 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| 950 vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| R7 260X vs 750 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $274 | ||
| R9 270 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 760 vs 670 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
