GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 Ti vs 680 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 Ti

Report a correction
Much lower TDP 60W vs 195W 3.2x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 680

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 26,525.5 vs 5,378 Around 5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 33,025 vs 20,401 More than 60% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 86.4 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 5,693 vs 3,699 Around 55% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 3,090.4 GFLOPS vs 1,728 GFLOPS Around 80% better floating-point performance
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 40 88 more texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 128.8 GTexel/s vs 82.64 GTexel/s More than 55% higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,400 MHz More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better sky diver factor score 381.6 vs 255.03 Around 50% better sky diver factor score
Significantly more shading units 1,536 vs 640 896 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 32.2 GPixel/s vs 16.32 GPixel/s More than 95% higher pixel rate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 36.8 fps vs 20.4 fps More than 80% higher crysis 3 framerate
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 64.7 fps vs 46.7 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,928 vs 1,830 60% better PassMark direct compute score
Better video composition score 72.95 frames/s vs 51.74 frames/s More than 40% better video composition score
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 55.8 vs 46.7 Around 20% higher bioshock infinite framerate

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs 680

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
182.53 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680
123.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750 Ti
56.77 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680
47.72 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street

Read more

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
The GTX 750 TI wins because of noise and power? But the graphics performance gap between the two is HUGE, both in benchmarks and actual usage. The 750 TI loses in almost every corner. The GTX 680 still packs such a punch that it is still being revisited in reviews every year since its release.
I love my GTX 680, but the Vram is slowly becoming a problem tbf... as to be expected.
comments powered by Disqus