GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 vs 560 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

GeForce GTX 750
5.8
GeForce GTX 560
6.4
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
5.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 750
5.8
GeForce GTX 560
6.7
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.0
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

GeForce GTX 750
6.1
GeForce GTX 560
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.6
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 750
7.7
GeForce GTX 560
7.4
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
7.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

GeForce GTX 750
n.d.
GeForce GTX 560
n.d.
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 750
9.7
GeForce GTX 560
8.8
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
9.6
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
6.5

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 750
5.9
GeForce GTX 560
6.5
GeForce GTX 750 Ti
6.2

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 750  based on its noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Front view of GeForce GTX 750
Front view of GeForce GTX 560

EVGA GeForce GTX 560

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,012 MHz vs 4,160 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Better sky diver factor score 233.04 vs 193.73 More than 20% better sky diver factor score
Higher memory clock speed 1,253 MHz vs 1,040 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 55W vs 150W 2.7x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 560

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 560

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 133.1 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s More than 65% higher memory bandwidth
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 75 vs 32 More than 2.2x higher FarCry 3 framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher texture rate 50.4 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s Around 55% higher texture rate
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
More texture mapping units 56 vs 32 24 more texture mapping units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 vs 560

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 750
28.99
GeForce GTX 560
28.4

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 750
233.04
GeForce GTX 560
193.73

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 750
16.72
GeForce GTX 560
16.53

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 750
35
GeForce GTX 560
40

FarCry 3

GeForce GTX 750
32
GeForce GTX 560
75

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 750  vs 560 
9.0
read review
9.3
read review

Comments

Showing 2 comments.
Urbany (12:30 AM, November 22, 2015)
I think winners are both. On games where is 1GB of VRAM used is GTX 560 better but games with 2GBs or VRAM needed (Fallout 4, AC:Syndicate) I think there is GTX 750 better with higher memory speed. But I own GTX 560 so Im okay with that :) :D
Havel Rock (01:31 AM, March 11, 2015)
Interesting debate I thought the 750 would win hands down!
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss