GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 750 vs 660 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 750

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 750

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 823 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 55W vs 130W 2.4x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 179.2 GB/s vs 80.2 GB/s Around 2.2x higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better PassMark score 4,119 vs 3,246 More than 25% better PassMark score
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Higher texture rate 79 GTexel/s vs 32.6 GTexel/s Around 2.5x higher texture rate
Much higher FarCry 3 framerate 80 vs 32 2.5x higher FarCry 3 framerate
Better floating-point performance 1,896 GFLOPS vs 1,044 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,600 MHz vs 5,012 MHz More than 10% higher effective memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 96 vs 32 Three times as many texture mapping units
Better fire strike factor score 53.49 vs 34.59 Around 55% better fire strike factor score
More shading units 1,152 vs 512 640 more shading units
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Higher memory clock speed 1,400 MHz vs 1,253 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
More SMX units 6 vs 3 Twice as many SMX units
Slightly better PassMark direct compute score 1,897 vs 1,377 Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 750 vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750
67.58 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
60.27 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750
41.59 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
27.57 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 750
3,352.1
GeForce GTX 660
3,359.77

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 750  vs 660 

9.0
9.0
Still, the card is amazingly efficient, which makes it a great fit for any small form-factor or media-center PC.
GeForce GTX 750

Read more

Comments

Showing 3 comments.
chyba 950 ANALfabeto
kk
wybieram gtx 9500 bo jest najlepsza :* BezPozdro
comments powered by Disqus