0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 760 vs 800M |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | More than 3.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | More than 13.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher clock speed | 980 MHz | vs | 738 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 2,257.9 GFLOPS | vs | 141.7 GFLOPS | Around 16x better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 94.1 GTexel/s | vs | 5.9 GTexel/s | Around 16x higher texture rate | |||
Higher pixel rate | 23.52 GPixel/s | vs | 1.48 GPixel/s | Around 16x higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 8 | 88 more texture mapping units | |||
More render output processors | 32 | vs | 8 | 24 more render output processors | |||
More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 48 | 1104 more shading units | |||
Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 65% higher memory clock speed | |||
Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 64 bit | 4x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Significantly lower TDP | 15W | vs | 170W | 11.3x lower TDP |
Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 760 vs 800M
memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory
GeForce GTX 760
192.3 GB/s
GeForce 800M
14.4 GB/s
pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second
GeForce GTX 760
23.52 GPixel/s
GeForce 800M
1.48 GPixel/s
texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping
GeForce GTX 760
94.1 GTexel/s
GeForce 800M
5.9 GTexel/s
floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers
GeForce GTX 760
2,257.9 GFLOPS
GeForce 800M
141.7 GFLOPS
shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading
GeForce GTX 760
1,152
GeForce 800M
48
texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes
Specifications Full list of technical specs
gpu | GeForce GTX 760 | vs | 800M |
---|---|---|---|
GPU brand | Nvidia | Nvidia | |
GPU name | GK116 | GF117 | |
Market | Desktop | Laptop | |
Clock speed | 980 MHz | 738 MHz | |
Is dual GPU | No | No | |
Reference card | None | None | |
raw performance | |||
Shading units | 1,152 | 48 | |
Texture mapping units | 96 | 8 | |
Render output processors | 32 | 8 | |
Pixel rate | 23.52 GPixel/s | 1.48 GPixel/s | |
Texture rate | 94.1 GTexel/s | 5.9 GTexel/s | |
Floating-point performance | 2,257.9 GFLOPS | 141.7 GFLOPS |
memory | GeForce GTX 760 | vs | 800M |
---|---|---|---|
Memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | 900 MHz | |
Effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | 1,800 MHz | |
Memory bus | 256 bit | 64 bit | |
Memory | 2,048 MB | 1,024 MB | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 | |
Memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | 14.4 GB/s | |
noise and power | |||
TDP | 170W | 15W |
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 13 desktops with the GeForce GTX 760, starting from $20
- 3 laptops with the GeForce 800M, starting from $1,095
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
760 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 770 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs 670 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs R9 280X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | ||
760 vs 660 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760 vs R9 270X | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||