Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Much higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 1,998 MHz More than 3x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 980 MHz vs 576 MHz More than 70% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 2,257.9 GFLOPS vs 1,192.4 GFLOPS Around 90% better floating-point performance
More shading units 1,152 vs 480 672 more shading units
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 999 MHz More than 50% higher memory clock speed
Significantly lower TDP 170W vs 289W More than 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 295

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 295

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much wider memory bus 896 bit vs 256 bit 3.5x wider memory bus
Higher memory bandwidth 223.8 GB/s vs 192.3 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more texture mapping units 160 vs 96 64 more texture mapping units
Significantly more render output processors 56 vs 32 24 more render output processors
Higher pixel rate 32.26 GPixel/s vs 23.52 GPixel/s More than 35% higher pixel rate

Features Key features of the GeForce GTX 760  vs 295 

memory bandwidth Rate at which data can be read from or stored in onboard memory

GeForce GTX 760
192.3 GB/s
GeForce GTX 295
223.8 GB/s

pixel rate Number of pixels a graphics card can render to the screen every second

GeForce GTX 760
23.52 GPixel/s
GeForce GTX 295
32.26 GPixel/s

texture rate Speed at which a graphics card can perform texture mapping

GeForce GTX 760
94.1 GTexel/s
GeForce GTX 295
92.16 GTexel/s

floating point performance How fast the gpu can crunch numbers

GeForce GTX 760
2,257.9 GFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
1,192.4 GFLOPS

shading units Subcomponents of the gpu, these run in parallel to enable fast pixel shading

texture mapping units Built into each gpu, these resize and rotate bitmaps for texturing scenes

Specifications Full list of technical specs

gpu

GeForce GTX 760  vs
295 
GPU brand Nvidia Nvidia
GPU name GK116 GT200 B3
Market Desktop Desktop
Clock speed 980 MHz 576 MHz
Is dual GPU No Yes
Reference card None Nvidia GeForce GTX 295 576 MHz 1.8 GB

raw performance

Shading units 1,152 480
Texture mapping units 96 160
Render output processors 32 56
Pixel rate 23.52 GPixel/s 32.26 GPixel/s
Texture rate 94.1 GTexel/s 92.16 GTexel/s
Floating-point performance 2,257.9 GFLOPS 1,192.4 GFLOPS

memory

GeForce GTX 760  vs
295 
Memory clock speed 1,502 MHz 999 MHz
Effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz 1,998 MHz
Memory bus 256 bit 896 bit
Memory 2,048 MB 1,792 MB
Memory type GDDR5 GDDR3
Memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s 223.8 GB/s

noise and power

TDP 170W 289W

Comments

comments powered by Disqus