GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760 vs 480

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 980 MHz vs 726 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 108W vs 190W Around 45% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 3,800 MHz Around 60% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 30,030 vs 20,100 Around 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much quieter load noise level 50 dB vs 64.1 dB More than 20% quieter load noise level
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 8,730 vs 5,014 Around 75% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More energy-efficient load power consumption 336W vs 421W More than 20% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Higher texture rate 94.1 GTexel/s vs 43.6 GTexel/s Around 2.2x higher texture rate
Slightly better passmark score 4,981 vs 4,346 Around 15% better passmark score
Better floating-point performance 2,258 GFLOPS vs 1,393 GFLOPS More than 60% better floating-point performance
Significantly quieter idle noise level 41 dB vs 44 dB More than 5% quieter idle noise level
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,536 MB Around 35% more memory
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 950 MHz Around 60% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,152 vs 480 672 more shading units
More texture mapping units 96 vs 60 36 more texture mapping units
Better passmark direct compute score 2,334 vs 1,604 More than 45% better passmark direct compute score
Lower TDP 170W vs 250W More than 30% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 480

Report a correction
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760 vs 480

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 760 GeForce GTX 480 @ community.futuremark.com

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 760  vs 480 

9.0
8.4
The game is a typical, linear first-person shooter but offers a talent tree, fast paced action, and one-on-one duels with special game mechanics.
GeForce GTX 760

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus