Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 760 vs 660 |
Released June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
- 980 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Palit has overclocked both GPU and memory on their GTX 760 JetStream out of the box, which provides a nice 6% performance improvement over the reference design.
VS
Released September, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
- 980 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Sep, 2012)The game graphics are, even today, top notch, yet the game still runs well on most computers.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760 vs 660
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013), Civilization 5 and Far Cry 3 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark and 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 1 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | 82.8 | vs | 65.3 | More than 25% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better passmark score | 4,967 | vs | 4,117 | More than 20% better passmark score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 192.3 GB/s | vs | 144.2 GB/s | Around 35% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly higher texture rate | 94.1 GTexel/s | vs | 78.4 GTexel/s | More than 20% higher texture rate | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 333.8 | vs | 288.9 | More than 15% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher far cry 3 framerate | 41.5 fps | vs | 32 fps | Around 30% higher far cry 3 framerate | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 103.4 fps | vs | 82.5 fps | More than 25% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher crysis: warhead framerate | 49.8 fps | vs | 39.6 fps | More than 25% higher crysis: warhead framerate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Higher civilization 5 framerate | 84.5 fps | vs | 72.2 fps | More than 15% higher civilization 5 framerate | |||
| Slightly better passmark direct compute score | 2,311 | vs | 1,904 | More than 20% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| More energy-efficient load power consumption | 296W | vs | 336W | More than 10% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| Quieter load noise level | 47.4 dB | vs | 50 dB | More than 5% quieter load noise level | |||
| Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | 5,000 | vs | 228 | Around 22x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | |||
| Lower TDP | 140W | vs | 170W | Around 20% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760 vs 660
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC
SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 760 | vs | 660 | ||
 | GeForce GTX 760 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 270X vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| 750 Ti vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 280X vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| 970 vs 760 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 750 Ti vs 660 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 660 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| 980 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs R9 280X | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 780 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs 770 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 6 comments.
