GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760 vs 660


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013), Civilization 5 and Far Cry 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark and 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 1 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 82.8 vs 65.3 More than 25% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 144.2 GB/s Around 35% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better PassMark score 4,955 vs 4,121 More than 20% better PassMark score
Higher texture rate 94.1 GTexel/s vs 78.4 GTexel/s More than 20% higher texture rate
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 333.8 vs 288.9 More than 15% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher far cry 3 framerate 41.5 fps vs 32 fps Around 30% higher far cry 3 framerate
Slightly more render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 103.4 fps vs 82.5 fps More than 25% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 49.8 fps vs 39.6 fps More than 25% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Higher civilization 5 framerate 84.5 fps vs 72.2 fps More than 15% higher civilization 5 framerate
More SMX units 6 vs 5 1 more SMX units
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
More energy-efficient load power consumption 296W vs 336W More than 10% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Quieter load noise level 47.4 dB vs 50 dB More than 5% quieter load noise level
Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score 5,000 vs 228 Around 22x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score
Lower TDP 140W vs 170W Around 20% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760 vs 660

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

GeForce GTX 760
49.8 fps
GeForce GTX 660
39.6 fps

Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC

SmallLux GPU 2.0d4 Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering

PassMark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 760  vs 660 

Gaming power consumption is roughly similar to the reference design, which is impressive because Palit's card comes with much higher clock speeds on both GPU and memory.
GeForce GTX 760

Read more


Showing 6 comments.
660 better or you got alot of budget and why dont just spent on high end?
SmallLux GPU 2.0dMeasures compute performance using OpenCL to do 3D rendering The GTX 760 SmallLux score seams odd to me when the 760 is a technically better card GeForce GTX 760 228 GeForce GTX 660 5,000
will this card fit into this case
The specs and benchmarks are collected from a variety of sources around the web (e.g. manufacturers, TechPowerUp, etc.)
Where did you get the spec?
comments powered by Disqus