Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 680 based on its gaming.
See full details GeForce GTX 760 vs 680 |
Released June, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760
- 980 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Palit has overclocked both GPU and memory on their GTX 760 JetStream out of the box, which provides a nice 6% performance improvement over the reference design.
VS
Released March, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
8 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Apr, 2012)Overall decent overclocking, it is nice to see that there is still some additional headroom for overclocking, despite the out of the large box overclock.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760 vs 680
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013), Civilization 5 and Far Cry 3 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4, Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and 2 more | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 680GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 58.7 fps | vs | 36.8 fps | Around 60% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quieter load noise level | 50 dB | vs | 51.9 dB | Around 5% quieter load noise level | |||
| Slightly more energy-efficient load power consumption | 336W | vs | 356W | More than 5% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| Slightly more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 108W | vs | 112W | Around 5% more energy-efficient idle power consumption | |||
| Slightly lower TDP | 170W | vs | 195W | Around 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | 106.1 | vs | 82.8 | Around 30% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score | |||
| Better passmark score | 5,707 | vs | 4,996 | Around 15% better passmark score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,090 GFLOPS | vs | 2,258 GFLOPS | More than 35% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 128.8 GTexel/s | vs | 94.1 GTexel/s | More than 35% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 33,025 | vs | 30,030 | Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 32.2 GPixel/s | vs | 23.5 GPixel/s | More than 35% higher pixel rate | |||
| Quieter idle noise level | 38.5 dB | vs | 41 dB | More than 5% quieter idle noise level | |||
| Better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | 7,800 | vs | 228 | Around 34.2x better SmallLuxGPU 2.0d4 score | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 96 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 1,152 | 384 more shading units | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 375 | vs | 333.8 | More than 10% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 176,118 | vs | 130,616 | Around 35% better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| Slightly higher turbo clock speed | 1,058 MHz | vs | 1,032 MHz | Around 5% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 119.6 fps | vs | 103.4 fps | More than 15% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 2,926 | vs | 2,396 | More than 20% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Higher civilization 5 framerate | 97.4 fps | vs | 84.5 fps | More than 15% higher civilization 5 framerate | |||
| Slightly higher far cry 3 framerate | 44.7 fps | vs | 41.5 fps | Around 10% higher far cry 3 framerate | |||
| More SMX units | 8 | vs | 6 | 2 more SMX units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760 vs 680
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 680 | by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2012)Further, 3DMark11 does not seem a good choice either, as it let me run much higher clocks than were stable in other tests.
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA
GeForce GTX 680 | by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2012)Our Crysis 2 installation uses the high-res texture pack and DX11 upgrade, which helps explain this reading.
Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC
GeForce GTX 680 | by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2012)By genre, TES: Skyrim is a role-playing game; it combines some of the best elements of older titles in the franchise, with some new sandbox elements to churn out an extremely engaging and addictive game.
BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 760 | vs | 680 | ||
 | GeForce GTX 680 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
