GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760M vs 840M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,221 vs 2,338 Around 8.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,394 vs 879 Around 60% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 12,477 vs 6,627 Around 90% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 94 fps vs 17.7 fps More than 5.2x higher diablo III framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 2,002 MHz More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 16.02 GB/s More than 4x higher memory bandwidth
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 13 vs 6.3 More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 16 48 more texture mapping units
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 13 fps vs 6.3 fps More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher texture rate 40.2 GTexel/s vs 16.46 GTexel/s Around 2.5x higher texture rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better video composition score 30.42 frames/s vs 21.01 frames/s Around 45% better video composition score
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,020 vs 726 More than 40% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 20 fps vs 13.5 fps Around 50% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce 840M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce 840M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,029 MHz vs 628 MHz Around 65% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 10,332 vs 3,395 More than 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher turbo clock speed 1,124 MHz vs 657 MHz More than 70% higher turbo clock speed
Better T-Rex score 3,359.62 vs 3,356.92 Almost the same
Lower TDP 33W vs 55W 40% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760M vs 840M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
53.99 mHash/s
GeForce 840M
94.68 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
15.67 mPixels/s
GeForce 840M
22.54 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
3,356.92
GeForce 840M
3,359.62

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
3,705.63
GeForce 840M
1,855.62

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus