GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760M vs 750M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games
GeForce GTX 760M
7.4
GeForce GT 750M
6.6
BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance
GeForce GTX 760M
7.2
GeForce GT 750M
6.7
Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU
GeForce GTX 760M
N/A
GeForce GT 750M
N/A
Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance
GeForce GTX 760M
7.2
GeForce GT 750M
6.6

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 760M
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 19,221 vs 13,670 More than 40% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 12,477 vs 8,200 More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better floating-point performance 964.6 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher texture rate 40.2 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 10 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s Around 35% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 73 fps vs 39.4 fps More than 85% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 61 fps vs 39.5 fps Around 55% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 94 fps vs 66.6 fps More than 40% higher diablo III framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 13 fps vs 9.85 fps More than 30% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher BioShock infinite framerate 20 fps vs 15.9 fps More than 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 628 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 4,008 MHz Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80 GB/s vs 64.1 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 1,002 MHz Around 25% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760M vs GT 750M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

GeForce GTX 760M
1,688
GeForce GT 750M
1,530
videocardbenchmark.net
Okay, so what do our synthetic tests from 3DMark and Unigine have to say about this debate?
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 760M
3,395
GeForce GT 750M
2,543
3DMark11 gives the advantage to NVIDIA’s cards by a strong margin (18).
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 760M
12,477
GeForce GT 750M
8,200
notebookcheck.net
3DMark11 tells a different story – there the HD 7950 Boost is slower than the GTX 760 at the Extreme preset.
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 760M
20 fps
GeForce GT 750M
15.9 fps
notebookcheck.net

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 760M
13 fps
GeForce GT 750M
9.85 fps
notebookcheck.net
The results for CrossFire remain the same here in Crysis 3 as they did in Battlefield – not great… While the GTX 760s in SLI see a 78% scaling rate, the runt frame issues haunt the AMD solutions as you can clearly see in our frame time graphs.
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset

GeForce GTX 760M
61 fps
GeForce GT 750M
39.5 fps
notebookcheck.net
The GTX 760 is definitely a step down from the GTX 770 when it comes to the gaming experience it provides but it also has a sizeable price advantage as well.
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Comments

Showing 6 comments.
Lykoz (12:18 AM, January 13, 2014)
Just a quick question, new MBP uses GTX 750m.. Why not use 760? is 750 more adaptable to ultraportable laptops? Eg asus uses 760m on what is a larger laptop. Basically is there any benefit to using gt 750m? or is it just cutting costs?
Guest (09:00 PM, October 17, 2013)
We've fixed that up, thanks!
Jude Fiorillo (07:53 PM, September 26, 2013)
Something looks a little bit wonky here, might be a bug. We'll look into this. I believe the GTX 760 is the winner here but as with a lot of our comparisons, our goal is to also highlight the differences to see how each GPU excels in which ways.
Vanyavar (04:33 PM, September 26, 2013)
It isn't. Take a closer look. "Winner Nvidia GeForce GT 750M GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its ."
Manuel Ponce Jara (07:03 PM, September 18, 2013)
The winner is the gtx 760, check the result
Key of Knowing (02:35 AM, August 10, 2013)
WHY IS THE GT 750M THE WINNER? :O It's very clear that the GTX 760M is the winner because of the clearly powerful performance rating.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss
Rebellion Media Technology