GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.3

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,221 vs 13,670 More than 40% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 12,477 vs 8,200 More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 40.2 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 964.6 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 61 fps vs 39.5 fps Around 55% higher dead space 3 framerate
Better T-Rex score 1,966.72 vs 1,733.92 Around 15% better T-Rex score
Higher diablo III framerate 94 fps vs 66.6 fps More than 40% higher diablo III framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 628 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 657 MHz More than 45% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
55.23 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
13.89 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
15.67 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
11.87 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
1,966.72
GeForce GT 750M
1,733.92

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
1,752.32
GeForce GT 750M
1,732.89

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

Showing 6 comments.
Just a quick question, new MBP uses GTX 750m.. Why not use 760? is 750 more adaptable to ultraportable laptops? Eg asus uses 760m on what is a larger laptop. Basically is there any benefit to using gt 750m? or is it just cutting costs?
We've fixed that up, thanks!
Something looks a little bit wonky here, might be a bug. We'll look into this. I believe the GTX 760 is the winner here but as with a lot of our comparisons, our goal is to also highlight the differences to see how each GPU excels in which ways.
It isn't. Take a closer look. "Winner Nvidia GeForce GT 750M GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its ."
The winner is the gtx 760, check the result
WHY IS THE GT 750M THE WINNER? :O It's very clear that the GTX 760M is the winner because of the clearly powerful performance rating.
comments powered by Disqus