GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 760M vs 750M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3 and Diablo III


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,221 vs 13,670 More than 40% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 12,477 vs 8,200 More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 40.2 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 35% higher texture rate
Slightly better floating-point performance 964.6 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 35% better floating-point performance
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 61 fps vs 39.5 fps Around 55% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 94 fps vs 66.6 fps More than 40% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly better T-Rex score 1,966.72 vs 1,733.92 Around 15% better T-Rex score
Slightly higher battlefield 4 framerate 18.8 vs 12 More than 55% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 628 MHz Around 50% higher clock speed
Much higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 657 MHz More than 45% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 760M vs GT 750M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
55.23 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
26.06 mHash/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GT 750M

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 760M
GeForce GT 750M

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)


Showing 6 comments.
Just a quick question, new MBP uses GTX 750m.. Why not use 760? is 750 more adaptable to ultraportable laptops? Eg asus uses 760m on what is a larger laptop. Basically is there any benefit to using gt 750m? or is it just cutting costs?
We've fixed that up, thanks!
Something looks a little bit wonky here, might be a bug. We'll look into this. I believe the GTX 760 is the winner here but as with a lot of our comparisons, our goal is to also highlight the differences to see how each GPU excels in which ways.
It isn't. Take a closer look. "Winner Nvidia GeForce GT 750M GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GT 750M based on its ."
The winner is the gtx 760, check the result
WHY IS THE GT 750M THE WINNER? :O It's very clear that the GTX 760M is the winner because of the clearly powerful performance rating.
comments powered by Disqus