GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 735M among Laptop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 8,924 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 575 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 1,881 vs 641 Around 3x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 5,058 Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 9.2 GTexel/s More than 5.5x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,224.2 GFLOPS vs 441.6 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,021 vs 1,692.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly more texture mapping units 64 vs 16 48 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.75 GPixel/s vs 4.6 GPixel/s More than 2.8x higher pixel rate
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 38.2 fps Around 3x higher diablo III framerate
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 2,432.09 Around 40% better T-Rex score
Better cloud gate factor score 15.43 vs 8.95 More than 70% better cloud gate factor score
Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 24.9 fps More than 2.8x higher dead space 3 framerate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher bioshock infinite framerate 23.3 vs 8.3 More than 2.8x higher bioshock infinite framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 8.28 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 735M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 735M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
21.87 mHash/s
GeForce GT 735M
39.3 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 735M
8.57 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
1,767.77
GeForce GT 735M
1,665.47

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus