GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 735M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming and benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 8,924 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 575 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 9.2 GTexel/s More than 5.5x higher texture rate
Better PassMark score 1,902 vs 633 More than 3x better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 5,058 Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 441.6 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly more texture mapping units 64 vs 16 48 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 4.6 GPixel/s More than 2.8x higher pixel rate
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,021 vs 1,692.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 24.9 fps More than 2.8x higher dead space 3 framerate
Better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 2,432.09 Around 40% better T-Rex score
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 38.2 fps Around 3x higher diablo III framerate
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 8.28 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 735M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 735M

Report a correction
Lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

GeForce GTX 765M
19.6 mHash/s
GeForce GT 735M
39.3 mHash/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GT 735M

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
GeForce GT 735M
8.28 fps


comments powered by Disqus