Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M based on its gaming.
See full details GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
- 797 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
VS
Released April, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 735M
- 575 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
5.9 Out of 10
by Slobodan-Simic (May, 2013)The GTX 765M is also based on the 28nm GK106 Kepler GPU but features 768 CUDA cores and works at 850MHz+ GPU clock and comes with 2GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4GHz and paired up with a 128-bit memory interface for 64GB/s of memory bandwidth.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 735M
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| BioShock Infinite, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3 | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 575 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 8,924 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better passmark score | 2,112 | vs | 721 | Around 3x better passmark score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 64.1 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,390 | vs | 5,058 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 1,224 GFLOPS | vs | 441.6 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 9.2 GTexel/s | More than 5.5x higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly higher pixel rate | 12.8 GPixel/s | vs | 4.6 GPixel/s | More than 2.8x higher pixel rate | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 4,021 | vs | 1,692.5 | Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 38.2 fps | Around 3x higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Significantly higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate | 63.6 fps | vs | 24 fps | Around 2.8x higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate | |||
| Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate | 70.1 fps | vs | 24.9 fps | More than 2.8x higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 23.25 fps | vs | 8.28 fps | More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 33W | vs | 75W | 2.3x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)For Ultrabooks and thinner machines you’ll have to step down to smaller, less power hungry GPUs like the GT 750 and 740 but even then we expect NVIDIA to have much faster gaming performance than the Haswell-based processor graphics.
Diablo III 1920 x 1080 - High + AA
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)Another advantage NVIDIA has held for a long time is on the driver front – most gaming laptops were able to use NVIDIA standard drivers to improve performance and compatibility on a much faster cadence than depending on laptop OEMs.
