0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
- 797 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
VS
Released April, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GT 735M
- 575 MHz
- 2 GB DDR3
by Tim-Verry (Jun, 2013)These chips are still based on Kepler (600-series), but feature more CUDA cores, more memory, a wider memory bus, and faster clockspeeds.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 735M among Laptop GPUs
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 8,924 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 575 MHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,390 | vs | 5,058 | Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 38.2 fps | Around 3x higher diablo III framerate | |||
Better PassMark score | 1,874 | vs | 652 | More than 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
Much higher dirt3 framerate | 45.8 | vs | 16.2 | More than 2.8x higher dirt3 framerate | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 1,800 MHz | Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 64.1 GB/s | vs | 14.4 GB/s | Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 4,021 | vs | 1,692.5 | Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 9.2 GTexel/s | More than 5.5x higher texture rate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | vs | 441.6 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 16 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
Significantly better T-Rex score | 3,339.9 | vs | 2,432.09 | More than 35% better T-Rex score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 12.75 GPixel/s | vs | 4.6 GPixel/s | More than 2.8x higher pixel rate | |||
More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
More render output processors | 16 | vs | 8 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
Wider memory bus | 128 bit | vs | 64 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 23.25 fps | vs | 8.28 fps | More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
Better fire strike factor score | 25.45 | vs | 11.46 | Around 2.2x better fire strike factor score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| |||||||
Lower TDP | 33W | vs | 75W | 2.3x lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
23.98 mHash/s
GeForce GT 735M
39.3 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 735M
8.57 mPixels/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
3,339.9
GeForce GT 735M
2,432.09
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
3,695.75
GeForce GT 735M
1,665.47
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 765M
25.45
GeForce GT 735M
11.46
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 765M
206.58
GeForce GT 735M
103.7
Bioshock Infinite
GeForce GTX 765M
23.3
GeForce GT 735M
8.3
Battlefield 3
GeForce GTX 765M
22.9