GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 735M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 575 MHz Around 40% higher clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 8,924 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher memory bandwidth 64.1 GB/s vs 14.4 GB/s Around 4.5x higher memory bandwidth
Better passmark score 2,090 vs 732 More than 2.8x better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 5,058 Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 1,800 MHz Around 2.2x higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 441.6 GFLOPS More than 2.8x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 9.2 GTexel/s More than 5.5x higher texture rate
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,021 vs 1,692.5 Around 2.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 4.6 GPixel/s More than 2.8x higher pixel rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 64 vs 16 48 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 38.2 fps Around 3x higher diablo III framerate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
More render output processors 16 vs 8 Twice as many render output processors
Significantly higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 63.6 fps vs 24 fps Around 2.8x higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 24.9 fps More than 2.8x higher dead space 3 framerate
Wider memory bus 128 bit vs 64 bit 2x wider memory bus
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 8.28 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GT 735M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 735M

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 33W vs 75W 2.3x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 735M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
GeForce GT 735M
8.28 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset

GeForce GTX 765M
70.1 fps
GeForce GT 735M
24.9 fps
For Ultrabooks and thinner machines you’ll have to step down to smaller, less power hungry GPUs like the GT 750 and 740 but even then we expect NVIDIA to have much faster gaming performance than the Haswell-based processor graphics.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Diablo III 1920 x 1080 - High + AA

GeForce GTX 765M
111.7 fps
GeForce GT 735M
38.2 fps
Another advantage NVIDIA has held for a long time is on the driver front – most gaming laptops were able to use NVIDIA standard drivers to improve performance and compatibility on a much faster cadence than depending on laptop OEMs.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)


comments powered by Disqus