GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 750M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

GeForce GTX 765M
5.8
GeForce GT 750M
5.2
GeForce GTX 850M
5.8
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 765M
6.4
GeForce GT 750M
6.2
GeForce GTX 850M
5.4
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

GeForce GTX 765M
5.5
GeForce GT 750M
5.3
GeForce GTX 850M
6.3
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 765M
6.7
GeForce GT 750M
7.0
GeForce GTX 850M
7.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

GeForce GTX 765M
5.1
GeForce GT 750M
5.2
GeForce GTX 850M
5.4
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 765M
9.1
GeForce GT 750M
9.7
GeForce GTX 850M
9.8
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
5.9

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 765M
5.9
GeForce GT 750M
5.8
GeForce GTX 850M
6.0

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 765M
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 13,670 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,874 vs 1,288 More than 45% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 8,200 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 70% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,224.2 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 30.11 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 9.85 fps Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better ocean surface simulation score 520.75 frames/s vs 251.62 frames/s More than 2x better ocean surface simulation score
Higher thief framerate 19.1 vs 10.5 More than 80% higher thief framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,273 vs 733 Around 75% better PassMark direct compute score
Better sky diver factor score 206.58 vs 147.38 More than 40% better sky diver factor score
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 16.3 fps Around 45% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,360.34 vs 3,343.45 Almost the same
Higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
27.59 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
16.18 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
3,343.45
GeForce GT 750M
3,360.34

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
3,711.62
GeForce GT 750M
3,570.08

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 765M
25.45
GeForce GT 750M
23.78

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 765M
206.58
GeForce GT 750M
147.38

Thief

GeForce GTX 765M
19.1
GeForce GT 750M
10.5

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 765M
28.15
GeForce GT 750M
12

Read more

Comments

Showing 7 comments.
RogerTheeAlien (12:53 PM, February 28, 2016)
If you enjoy Lenovo's garbage TF panels, then go for Lenovo... Least alienware offers an IPS display. lol. I've had the Lenovo Y50 and it was such a cheap, plastic feeling unit. Not a fan of that.
Navihawk (08:58 AM, April 9, 2014)
however, you getgt 755s with thenew modelsinstead
LatentSea (08:55 AM, April 9, 2014)
Fair enough, I agree completely, I'm actually looking into getting the very same laptop you're talking about.
Navihawk (01:46 AM, April 9, 2014)
I run into a number of people that say that a single 765 is better than 2 750s in SLI (those people who love ailenware in particular) when in reality, as long as there is SLI support, it will run better on the 2 750s, granted some games that do sub 60 will have microstuttering at times, which is the reasoning to get a system with the 765 or higher. But, for the people like myself who cannot spend over a grand on a high-performance laptop, the particular model i picked up from lenovo was perfect and was a better deal compared to some of these MSI and ailenware laptops that are over a grand or more.
Navihawk (02:20 PM, April 8, 2014)
yes i do thank you.
LatentSea (12:08 PM, April 8, 2014)
You do understand that SLI means there are two 750's running at once right?
Navihawk (06:45 AM, April 8, 2014)
GT 750M curbstomps the 765 when in SLI (lenovo y510p)
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss