GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 750M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games
GeForce GTX 765M
7.6
GeForce GT 750M
6.6
BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance
GeForce GTX 765M
7.5
GeForce GT 750M
6.7
Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU
GeForce GTX 765M
7.2
GeForce GT 750M
6.4
Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance
GeForce GTX 765M
7.3
GeForce GT 750M
6.5

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 765M
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 13,670 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 8,200 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better passmark score 2,114 vs 1,529 Around 40% better passmark score
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 70% higher diablo III framerate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 39.5 fps More than 75% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 63.6 fps vs 39.4 fps More than 60% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Better passmark direct compute score 1,255 vs 738 More than 70% better passmark direct compute score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 9.85 fps Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 15.9 fps More than 45% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 55,794 vs 38,698 Around 45% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 4,008 MHz Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 80 GB/s vs 64.1 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 1,002 MHz Around 25% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 750M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

GeForce GTX 765M
2,114
GeForce GT 750M
1,529
videocardbenchmark.net
I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 765M
4,021
GeForce GT 750M
2,543
Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
GeForce GT 750M
15.9 fps
notebookcheck.net
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 765M
14.2 fps
GeForce GT 750M
9.85 fps
notebookcheck.net

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

GeForce GTX 765M
1,255
GeForce GT 750M
738
videocardbenchmark.net

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

GeForce GTX 765M
55,794
GeForce GT 750M
38,698
clbenchmark.com

Read more

Comments

Showing 6 comments.
Temariix (08:58 AM, April 9, 2014)
however, you getgt 755s with thenew modelsinstead
LatentSea (08:55 AM, April 9, 2014)
Fair enough, I agree completely, I'm actually looking into getting the very same laptop you're talking about.
Temariix (01:46 AM, April 9, 2014)
I run into a number of people that say that a single 765 is better than 2 750s in SLI (those people who love ailenware in particular) when in reality, as long as there is SLI support, it will run better on the 2 750s, granted some games that do sub 60 will have microstuttering at times, which is the reasoning to get a system with the 765 or higher. But, for the people like myself who cannot spend over a grand on a high-performance laptop, the particular model i picked up from lenovo was perfect and was a better deal compared to some of these MSI and ailenware laptops that are over a grand or more.
Temariix (02:20 PM, April 8, 2014)
yes i do thank you.
LatentSea (12:08 PM, April 8, 2014)
You do understand that SLI means there are two 750's running at once right?
Temariix (06:45 AM, April 8, 2014)
GT 750M curbstomps the 765 when in SLI (lenovo y510p)
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss
Rebellion Media Technology