GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 750M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 13,670 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,919 vs 1,311 More than 45% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 8,200 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 1,712.9 More than 95% better T-Rex score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 39.5 fps More than 75% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 63.6 fps vs 39.4 fps More than 60% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 70% higher diablo III framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,229 vs 717 More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 9.85 fps Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher BioShock infinite framerate 23.25 fps vs 16.3 fps Around 45% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 750M

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

GeForce GTX 765M
GeForce GT 750M

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
GeForce GT 750M
16.3 fps

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 765M
14.2 fps
GeForce GT 750M
9.85 fps

Read more


Showing 6 comments.
however, you getgt 755s with thenew modelsinstead
Fair enough, I agree completely, I'm actually looking into getting the very same laptop you're talking about.
I run into a number of people that say that a single 765 is better than 2 750s in SLI (those people who love ailenware in particular) when in reality, as long as there is SLI support, it will run better on the 2 750s, granted some games that do sub 60 will have microstuttering at times, which is the reasoning to get a system with the 765 or higher. But, for the people like myself who cannot spend over a grand on a high-performance laptop, the particular model i picked up from lenovo was perfect and was a better deal compared to some of these MSI and ailenware laptops that are over a grand or more.
yes i do thank you.
You do understand that SLI means there are two 750's running at once right?
GT 750M curbstomps the 765 when in SLI (lenovo y510p)
comments powered by Disqus