Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 750M |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
5.9 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 13,670 | Around 45% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better PassMark score | 1,874 | vs | 1,288 | More than 45% better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,390 | vs | 8,200 | Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 66.6 fps | Around 70% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | vs | 722.7 GFLOPS | Around 70% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 30.11 GTexel/s | Around 70% higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 14.2 fps | vs | 9.85 fps | Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Better ocean surface simulation score | 520.75 frames/s | vs | 251.62 frames/s | More than 2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Higher thief framerate | 19.1 | vs | 10.5 | More than 80% higher thief framerate | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,273 | vs | 733 | Around 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Better sky diver factor score | 206.58 | vs | 147.38 | More than 40% better sky diver factor score | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 23.25 fps | vs | 16.3 fps | Around 45% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,360.34 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
Higher clock speed | 941 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 967 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP |
Looking for a laptop?
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 840M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 740M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs R7 M265 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 650M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 755M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 860M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs RX 580 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$280 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1070 vs RX 580 | ||