GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 750M


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 13,670 Around 45% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 8,200 Around 65% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 30.1 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
Better PassMark score 1,902 vs 1,300 More than 45% better PassMark score
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 722.7 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Significantly better T-Rex score 3,352.1 vs 1,733.92 Around 95% better T-Rex score
Much higher battlefield 3 framerate 22.9 vs 12.8 Around 80% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 55,794 vs 38,698 Around 45% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 7.53 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 39.5 fps More than 75% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 66.6 fps Around 70% higher diablo III framerate
Better cloud gate factor score 15.34 vs 12.44 Around 25% better cloud gate factor score
Better sky diver factor score 202.38 vs 143.07 More than 40% better sky diver factor score
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 28.15 vs 12 More than 2.2x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,231 vs 716 More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher thief framerate 19.1 vs 10.5 More than 80% higher thief framerate
Slightly higher metro: last light framerate 18.2 vs 11.85 Around 55% higher metro: last light framerate
Slightly higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 9.85 fps Around 45% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly higher bioshock infinite framerate 23.3 vs 15.5 More than 50% higher bioshock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 750M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 750M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 941 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 967 MHz vs 863 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 750M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
19.76 mHash/s
GeForce GT 750M
13.89 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 750M
11.87 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
225.12 frames/s
GeForce GT 750M
403 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
71.92 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 750M
144 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
0.73 frames/s
GeForce GT 750M
1.15 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
11.47 frames/s
GeForce GT 750M
22.97 frames/s

Read more


Showing 7 comments.
If you enjoy Lenovo's garbage TF panels, then go for Lenovo... Least alienware offers an IPS display. lol. I've had the Lenovo Y50 and it was such a cheap, plastic feeling unit. Not a fan of that.
however, you getgt 755s with thenew modelsinstead
Fair enough, I agree completely, I'm actually looking into getting the very same laptop you're talking about.
I run into a number of people that say that a single 765 is better than 2 750s in SLI (those people who love ailenware in particular) when in reality, as long as there is SLI support, it will run better on the 2 750s, granted some games that do sub 60 will have microstuttering at times, which is the reasoning to get a system with the 765 or higher. But, for the people like myself who cannot spend over a grand on a high-performance laptop, the particular model i picked up from lenovo was perfect and was a better deal compared to some of these MSI and ailenware laptops that are over a grand or more.
yes i do thank you.
You do understand that SLI means there are two 750's running at once right?
GT 750M curbstomps the 765 when in SLI (lenovo y510p)
comments powered by Disqus