GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 755M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 15,861 Around 25% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 1,874 vs 1,577 Around 20% better PassMark score
Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 11,600 More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Slightly better floating-point performance 1,224.2 GFLOPS vs 752.6 GFLOPS Around 65% better floating-point performance
More texture mapping units 64 vs 32 Twice as many texture mapping units
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 31.36 GTexel/s Around 65% higher texture rate
More shading units 768 vs 384 Twice as many shading units
Better manhattan score 3,711.62 vs 3,327.28 More than 10% better manhattan score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,273 vs 763 More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score
Better cloud gate factor score 15.84 vs 12.88 Around 25% better cloud gate factor score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 vs 12.4 Around 15% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 12.4 fps Around 15% higher crysis 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GT 755M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 755M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 980 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,400 MHz vs 4,008 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 86.4 GB/s vs 64.1 GB/s Around 35% higher memory bandwidth
Higher memory clock speed 1,350 MHz vs 1,002 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 50W vs 75W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs GT 755M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s
GeForce GT 755M
28.03 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 755M
12.45 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
3,343.45
GeForce GT 755M
3,342.63

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
3,711.62
GeForce GT 755M
3,327.28

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Bioshock Infinite

Comments

comments powered by Disqus