GeForce GTX 765M vs 580M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 580M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 3,116.5 | More than 6.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 620 MHz | Around 30% higher clock speed | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 70.9 fps | Around 60% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 3,000 MHz | Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 750 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,273 | vs | 954 | Around 35% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 20,550.5 | vs | 4,021 | More than 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,358.98 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,286 | vs | 1,874 | More than 20% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 96 GB/s | vs | 64.1 GB/s | Around 50% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| Better video composition score | 29.7 frames/s | vs | 19.95 frames/s | Around 50% better video composition score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 580M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Dirt3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 860M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 850M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 750M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 770M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 760M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 960M vs 765M | ||
 | VS | |
| 660M vs 765M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
