GeForce GTX 765M vs 660M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 660M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 14,704 | Around 35% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better PassMark score | 1,874 | vs | 1,412 | Around 35% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,390 | vs | 9,803 | More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 67 fps | More than 65% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | vs | 641.3 GFLOPS | More than 90% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 26.72 GTexel/s | More than 90% higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 14.2 fps | vs | 10 fps | More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,273 | vs | 739 | More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher thief framerate | 19.1 | vs | 13 | More than 45% higher thief framerate | |||
| Slightly better ocean surface simulation score | 520.75 frames/s | vs | 405.09 frames/s | Around 30% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| |||||||
| Much better T-Rex score | 3,353.58 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 660M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 6 laptops with the GeForce GTX 765M, starting from $1,650
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 660M, starting from $1,000
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 765M vs 860M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 765M vs 850M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 765M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 765M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 660M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660M vs 740M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 660M vs 840M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 380 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 390 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
