0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 765M vs 660M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 660M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 19,624 | vs | 14,704 | Around 35% better 3DMark06 score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better PassMark score | 1,874 | vs | 1,412 | Around 35% better PassMark score | |||
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 13,390 | vs | 9,803 | More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Much higher diablo III framerate | 111.7 fps | vs | 67 fps | More than 65% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Better floating-point performance | 1,224.2 GFLOPS | vs | 641.3 GFLOPS | More than 90% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher texture rate | 51 GTexel/s | vs | 26.72 GTexel/s | More than 90% higher texture rate | |||
More texture mapping units | 64 | vs | 32 | Twice as many texture mapping units | |||
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 14.2 fps | vs | 10 fps | More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
More shading units | 768 | vs | 384 | Twice as many shading units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,273 | vs | 739 | More than 70% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher thief framerate | 19.1 | vs | 13 | More than 45% higher thief framerate | |||
Slightly better ocean surface simulation score | 520.75 frames/s | vs | 405.09 frames/s | Around 30% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| |||||||
Much better T-Rex score | 3,353.58 | vs | 3,343.45 | Almost the same | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Lower TDP | 50W | vs | 75W | Around 35% lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 660M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
43.54 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660M
33.75 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
8.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660M
10.84 mPixels/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
3,343.45
GeForce GTX 660M
3,353.58
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 765M
3,711.62
GeForce GTX 660M
3,709.34
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 765M
25.45
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 765M
206.58
GeForce GTX 660M
149.18
Thief
GeForce GTX 765M
19.1
Battlefield 4
GeForce GTX 765M
28.15
GeForce GTX 660M
35.45
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 6 laptops with the GeForce GTX 765M, starting from $1,650
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 660M, starting from $1,000
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 860M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 770M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 760M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
660M vs 750M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
660M vs 740M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
970 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
750 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 390 | ||