GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 670M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 2,698 More than 7.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 598 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 3,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 33.5 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 803.7 GFLOPS More than 50% better floating-point performance
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,526 MB Around 35% more memory
More shading units 768 vs 336 432 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 8.37 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 59 fps Around 90% higher diablo III framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 22.9 vs 19.8 More than 15% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 55,794 vs 50,756 Around 10% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Slightly more texture mapping units 64 vs 56 8 more texture mapping units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 59.7 fps More than 15% higher dead space 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,231 vs 904 More than 35% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 670M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 19,451.5 vs 4,021 More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better manhattan score 3,865.63 vs 1,767.77 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus
Slightly better particle simulation score 158.11 mInteraction/s vs 71.92 mInteraction/s Around 2.2x better particle simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 670M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
19.76 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 670M
59.14 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 670M
16.9 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus