GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 670M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

PassMark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 2,698 More than 7.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 598 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 3,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 33.5 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 803.7 GFLOPS More than 50% better floating-point performance
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,526 MB Around 35% more memory
More shading units 768 vs 336 432 more shading units
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 8.37 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 59 fps Around 90% higher diablo III framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 22.9 vs 19.8 More than 15% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 55,794 vs 50,756 Around 10% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Slightly more texture mapping units 64 vs 56 8 more texture mapping units
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 59.7 fps More than 15% higher dead space 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,231 vs 903 More than 35% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 670M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670M

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 19,451.5 vs 4,021 More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better manhattan score 3,865.63 vs 1,767.77 Around 2.2x better manhattan score
Much better T-Rex score 5,034.35 vs 3,352.1 More than 50% better T-Rex score
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 670M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
19.76 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 670M
52.9 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
8.79 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 670M
15.06 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
225.12 frames/s
GeForce GTX 670M
588.64 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
71.92 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 670M
157.85 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
0.73 frames/s
GeForce GTX 670M
-1 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 765M
11.47 frames/s
GeForce GTX 670M
35.92 frames/s

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus