GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 670M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 2,698 More than 7.2x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 598 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 3,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 803.7 GFLOPS More than 50% better floating-point performance
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,526 MB Around 35% more memory
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 13,390 vs 11,021 More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 33.5 GTexel/s More than 50% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 8.37 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
More shading units 768 vs 336 432 more shading units
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 59 fps Around 90% higher diablo III framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
Better passmark direct compute score 1,250 vs 898 Around 40% better passmark direct compute score
Slightly more texture mapping units 64 vs 56 8 more texture mapping units
Higher crysis 3 framerate 14.2 fps vs 11.2 fps More than 25% higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 63.6 fps vs 54.4 fps More than 15% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 59.7 fps More than 15% higher dead space 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 670M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 19,451.5 vs 4,021 More than 4.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 72 GB/s vs 64.1 GB/s More than 10% higher memory bandwidth
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 670M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
GeForce GTX 670M
23.1 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

Nvidia’s architecture establishes a distinct lead in Crysis 2, DiRT 3, and WoW.
GeForce GTX 670M | by Chris-Angelini (May, 2012)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus