GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 670MX

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 19,624 vs 3,587 Around 5.5x better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 601 MHz Around 35% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 2,800 MHz Around 45% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 700 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 89.5 fps Around 25% higher diablo III framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 670MX

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 670MX

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 20,268 vs 4,021 More than 5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
More texture mapping units 80 vs 64 16 more texture mapping units
More shading units 960 vs 768 192 more shading units
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 670MX

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 765M
23.25 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

Nvidia’s architecture establishes a distinct lead in Crysis 2, DiRT 3, and WoW.
GeForce GTX 670MX | by Chris-Angelini (May, 2012)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
shit cards
comments powered by Disqus