GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 765M vs 760M

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 765M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 797 MHz vs 628 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Slightly better passmark score 2,080 vs 1,666 Around 25% better passmark score
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 863 MHz vs 657 MHz More than 30% higher turbo clock speed
Better floating-point performance 1,224 GFLOPS vs 964.6 GFLOPS More than 25% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 51 GTexel/s vs 40.2 GTexel/s More than 25% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 12.8 GPixel/s vs 10 GPixel/s Around 30% higher pixel rate
Higher diablo III framerate 111.7 fps vs 94 fps Around 20% higher diablo III framerate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 70.1 fps vs 61 fps Around 15% higher dead space 3 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 760M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760M

Report a correction
Higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate 73 fps vs 63.6 fps Around 15% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate
Lower TDP 55W vs 75W More than 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 765M vs 760M

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

3DMark11 gives the advantage to NVIDIA’s cards by a strong margin (18).
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

The results for CrossFire remain the same here in Crysis 3 as they did in Battlefield – not great… While the GTX 760s in SLI see a 78% scaling rate, the runt frame issues haunt the AMD solutions as you can clearly see in our frame time graphs.
GeForce GTX 760M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset

For Ultrabooks and thinner machines you’ll have to step down to smaller, less power hungry GPUs like the GT 750 and 740 but even then we expect NVIDIA to have much faster gaming performance than the Haswell-based processor graphics.
GeForce GTX 765M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
I overclocked my 760m to the performance of the 765m.... even alittle better since i pushed the memory abit!
comments powered by Disqus