GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 545 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.2

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 12,710 More than 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 6,640 Around 5.5x better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better PassMark score 6,099 vs 1,285 Around 4.8x better PassMark score
Much higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 64 GB/s 3.5x higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 1,600 More than 7x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 4,000 MHz More than 75% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 501.4 GFLOPS Around 6.5x better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 20.9 GTexel/s Around 6.5x higher texture rate
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 871 MHz More than 20% higher clock speed
Much better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 106.99 More than 3.5x better sky diver factor score
Many more texture mapping units 128 vs 24 104 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 5.23 GPixel/s Around 6.5x higher pixel rate
Much better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 306.54 frames/s More than 5.2x better ocean surface simulation score
Significantly more shading units 1,536 vs 144 1392 more shading units
More memory 2,048 MB vs 1,024 MB 2x more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,000 MHz More than 75% higher memory clock speed
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 517 Around 6x better PassMark direct compute score
More render output processors 32 vs 16 Twice as many render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 128 bit 2x wider memory bus
Front view of GeForce GT 545

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GT 545

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 105W vs 230W 2.2x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs GT 545

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GT 545
35.37 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GT 545
10.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s
GeForce GT 545
306.54 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
480.54 mInteraction/s
GeForce GT 545
92.76 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38
GeForce GT 545
3,356.56

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32
GeForce GT 545
3,309.72

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus