GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 1050 among all GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more


Overall Score

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 6,099 vs 4,443 More than 35% better PassMark score
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 112.1 GB/s Around 2x higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 58.2 GTexel/s More than 2.2x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,862 GFLOPS Around 75% better floating-point performance
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 40 88 more texture mapping units
More shading units 1,536 vs 640 896 more shading units
Better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 303.85 More than 25% better sky diver factor score
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 1,102.04 frames/s Around 50% better ocean surface simulation score
Higher metro: last light framerate 70 vs 44.5 More than 55% higher metro: last light framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 1050

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,354 MHz vs 1,046 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 1,455 MHz vs 1,085 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Higher pixel rate 46.56 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s Around 40% higher pixel rate
Significantly lower TDP 75W vs 230W 3.1x lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 1050

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050
215.14 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050
67.49 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 1050

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 1050

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more


Showing 4 comments.
Nobody gives a f... is definetely wrong, moron. Many people care about, except they still live with their parents and daddy pays the electricity bills.
for mining/power consumption ratio it is essential to have power usage, you would also want to avoid putting 1/2KW of heat into a small system. the power consumption is almost equivelant to the heat it spits out, if you got 2 770s you'll have 500w of heat coming out of em, its not about saving the planet. i would implore you to think more critically before you go on your self aggrandising idiotic rants. (even though i know the possibility of you doing this is rather remote)
The power consumption will influence peoples decisions with lower wattage power supplies...
nobody gives a flying eff about power consumption REMOVE IT FROM THE CHART IT HAS ABSOLUTELY NO SIGNIFICANCE ON BENCHMARKS, the minute some one says they do i will set a tire on fire JUST TO COUNTER ALL THEIR SAVE THE ENVIRONMENT B.S. this mentality is why 50% of america wants to jump into civil war with the 49% who are jokes for human beings.
comments powered by Disqus