GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 480 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 20,100 Around 80% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 3,800 MHz Around 85% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 726 MHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 5,014 More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 23,824 Around 25% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 6,099 vs 4,356 More than 40% better PassMark score
Significantly higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 43.56 GTexel/s More than 3x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,393 GFLOPS More than 2.2x better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 182.4 GB/s Around 25% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 244.88 More than 55% better sky diver factor score
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 60 68 more texture mapping units
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 706.1 frames/s More than 2.2x better ocean surface simulation score
Significantly more shading units 1,536 vs 480 1056 more shading units
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 950 MHz Around 85% higher memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 21.78 GPixel/s Around 55% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher metro: last light framerate 70 vs 38 Around 85% higher metro: last light framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 1,561 Around 2x better PassMark direct compute score
Slightly lower TDP 230W vs 250W Around 10% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 480

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 480

Report a correction
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 480

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 480
116.66 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 480
34.48 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s
GeForce GTX 480
706.1 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38
GeForce GTX 480
3,359.44

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32
GeForce GTX 480
3,696.63

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus