GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 570


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013) and Far Cry 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

PassMark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013), PassMark Direct Compute and 1 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its gaming, benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 797 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 20,620 More than 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 21,006.5 More than 40% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 109.5 vs 40.3 Around 2.8x better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 3,900 MHz Around 80% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 6,147 vs 4,391 Around 40% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 5,033 Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 156 GB/s Around 45% higher memory bandwidth
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 47.8 GTexel/s More than 2.8x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,530 GFLOPS More than 2x better floating-point performance
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 360W More than 30% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Significantly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 109W vs 125W Around 15% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Slightly more memory 2,048 MB vs 1,280 MB 60% more memory
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 975 MHz Around 80% higher memory clock speed
Much better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 395 vs 275 Around 45% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
More shading units 1,536 vs 480 1056 more shading units
More texture mapping units 128 vs 60 68 more texture mapping units
Significantly higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 65.2 fps Around 95% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 23.9 GPixel/s More than 40% higher pixel rate
Quieter idle noise level 38.2 dB vs 40.4 dB More than 5% quieter idle noise level
Higher far cry 3 framerate 50.4 fps vs 30 fps Around 70% higher far cry 3 framerate
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,392.76 frames/s vs 915.97 frames/s More than 50% better ocean surface simulation score
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 57 fps vs 36.2 fps More than 55% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,011 vs 1,621 More than 85% better PassMark direct compute score
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 48.6 dB Around 5% quieter load noise level
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 164,636 vs 118,645 Around 40% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Front view of GeForce GTX 570

Reasons to consider the
EVGA GeForce GTX 570

Report a correction
Slightly more render output processors 40 vs 32 8 more render output processors

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 570

PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

CompuBench 1.5 (Bitcoin mining)

GeForce GTX 770
103.77 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 570
85.94 mHash/s

GFXBench 3.0 (T-Rex)

GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 570

GFXBench 3.0 (Manhattan)

GeForce GTX 770
GeForce GTX 570

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 570 

The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770


Showing 6 comments.
thats 125 pounds
today im gonna buy a gtx770 twinfrozer oc edition for 165 euro :)
The question is... why is the 570 the same price I bought it for 2 years ago? If that would translate to ebay I might consider upgrading.
Hmm that is true.
95% higher Fps on Battlefield 3 and 70% higher fps on Farcry 3, i think you more gain than 30% of performance.
It's only around 30% faster... is it really worth spending around £370 quid for only 30% more speed.
comments powered by Disqus