GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 580 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 6,065 Around 5x better 3DMark06 score
Much higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 4,032 MHz Around 75% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 24,202.5 Around 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 810 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 6,099 vs 5,018 More than 20% better PassMark score
Significantly higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 51.84 GTexel/s More than 2.5x higher texture rate
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,659 GFLOPS Around 95% better floating-point performance
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 193.5 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more shading units 1,536 vs 512 Three times as many shading units
Significantly more texture mapping units 128 vs 64 Twice as many texture mapping units
Much higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,008 MHz Around 75% higher memory clock speed
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 40 More than 2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly better sky diver factor score 381.9 vs 293.1 More than 30% better sky diver factor score
Slightly higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 25.92 GPixel/s Around 30% higher pixel rate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 1,855 More than 65% better PassMark direct compute score
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 1,401.19 frames/s More than 15% better ocean surface simulation score
Front view of GeForce GTX 580

Reasons to consider the
SPARKLE GeForce GTX 580

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 24,765 vs 11,310 Around 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 580

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 580
142.43 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 580
35.72 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
1,631.29 frames/s
GeForce GTX 580
1,401.19 frames/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38
GeForce GTX 580
3,351.03

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32
GeForce GTX 580
3,709.27

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

Comments

comments powered by Disqus