GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 660 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 18,060 Around 65% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 25,130 Around 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 6,850 More than 65% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 823 MHz More than 25% higher clock speed
Better PassMark score 6,127 vs 4,118 Around 50% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 5,600 MHz More than 25% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 179.2 GB/s More than 25% higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 1,896.2 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 79 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 19.75 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 888 MHz More than 20% higher turbo clock speed
Better fire strike factor score 60.63 vs 44.31 More than 35% better fire strike factor score
More texture mapping units 128 vs 96 32 more texture mapping units
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,400 MHz More than 25% higher memory clock speed
More shading units 1,536 vs 1,152 384 more shading units
Significantly more SMX units 8 vs 6 2 more SMX units
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,036 vs 1,917 Around 60% better PassMark direct compute score
Front view of GeForce GTX 660

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 130W vs 230W Around 45% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 660

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.1 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660
60.27 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.08 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660
27.57 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,359.26
GeForce GTX 660
3,359.77

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,719.29
GeForce GTX 660
3,718.88

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Metro: Last Light

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 660 

9.6
9.0
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

comments powered by Disqus