GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.4

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its gaming, benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 318W Around 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 109W vs 111W Almost the same
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 22,997 Around 30% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 27,687 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 144.2 GB/s More than 55% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 8,415 Around 35% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better PassMark score 6,143 vs 4,708 More than 30% better PassMark score
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 915 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 32 Around 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate
Much better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 395 vs 297.4 Around 35% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 2,459.5 GFLOPS More than 30% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 102.5 GTexel/s More than 30% higher texture rate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 62.9 fps Around 35% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 96.9 fps More than 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 980 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 57 fps vs 41.6 fps More than 35% higher crysis: warhead framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Better fire strike factor score 73.29 vs 60.85 More than 20% better fire strike factor score
Slightly more texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units
More SMX units 8 vs 7 1 more SMX units
Slightly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 164,636 vs 134,925 More than 20% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Front view of GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly lower TDP 150W vs 230W Around 35% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 660 Ti

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
113.06 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
102.18 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.74 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660 Ti
34.93 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 660 Ti 

9.6
9.5
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

comments powered by Disqus