Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 based on its gaming, benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details GeForce GTX 770 vs 660 Ti |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
- 1 GHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.4 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!The new reference design PCB also allowed NVIDIA to, aside from giving the GK104 a strong enough VRM to maintain those high clock speeds, deploy its brand new GPU Boost 2.0 technology, which makes higher GPU core clock speeds available to demanding applications by taking into account not only power draw but also GPU temperatures.
VS
Released August, 2012
Generic GeForce GTX 660 Ti
- 915 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
7.3 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Aug, 2012)By genre, TES: Skyrim is a role-playing game - it combines some of the best elements of older titles in the franchise with some new sandbox elements to churn out an extremely engaging and addictive game.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.4 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more energy-efficient load power consumption | 246W | vs | 318W | Around 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 109W | vs | 111W | Almost the same | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 29,690 | vs | 22,997 | Around 30% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,150 | vs | 27,687 | More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | vs | 144.2 GB/s | More than 55% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,310 | vs | 8,415 | Around 35% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,143 | vs | 4,708 | More than 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,046 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 84 | vs | 32 | Around 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Much better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 395 | vs | 297.4 | Around 35% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,213 GFLOPS | vs | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | More than 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 134 GTexel/s | vs | 102.5 GTexel/s | More than 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 83.4 fps | vs | 62.9 fps | Around 35% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher battlefield 3 framerate | 126.2 fps | vs | 96.9 fps | More than 30% higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher crysis: warhead framerate | 57 fps | vs | 41.6 fps | More than 35% higher crysis: warhead framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 73.29 | vs | 60.85 | More than 20% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 112 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| More SMX units | 8 | vs | 7 | 1 more SMX units | |||
| Slightly better CLBenchmark raytrace score | 164,636 | vs | 134,925 | More than 20% better CLBenchmark raytrace score | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower TDP | 150W | vs | 230W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 660 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 770 | vs | 660 Ti | ||
 | GeForce GTX 770 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
