Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 770 vs 660 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 660 Ti among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 29,690 | vs | 22,997 | Around 30% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | vs | 144.2 GB/s | More than 55% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,150 | vs | 27,687 | More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,099 | vs | 4,686 | More than 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,046 MHz | vs | 915 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,310 | vs | 8,415 | Around 35% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much higher crysis 3 framerate | 84 | vs | 32 | Around 2.8x higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,213 GFLOPS | vs | 2,459.5 GFLOPS | More than 30% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 134 GTexel/s | vs | 102.5 GTexel/s | More than 30% higher texture rate | |||
| Better ocean surface simulation score | 1,631.29 frames/s | vs | 1,032.68 frames/s | Around 60% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Slightly higher pixel rate | 33.5 GPixel/s | vs | 25.62 GPixel/s | More than 30% higher pixel rate | |||
| Better sky diver factor score | 381.9 | vs | 334.44 | Around 15% better sky diver factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 83.4 fps | vs | 62.9 fps | Around 35% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 980 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 112 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 1,536 | vs | 1,344 | 192 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,083 | vs | 2,546 | More than 20% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 150W | vs | 230W | Around 35% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
