GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 680 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

GeForce GTX 770
7.4
GeForce GTX 680
6.5
GeForce GTX 960
6.7
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 770
6.3
GeForce GTX 680
6.4
GeForce GTX 960
8.0
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

GeForce GTX 770
6.9
GeForce GTX 680
6.7
GeForce GTX 960
6.4
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 770
7.1
GeForce GTX 680
7.0
GeForce GTX 960
8.2
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

GeForce GTX 770
n.d.
GeForce GTX 680
n.d.
GeForce GTX 960
n.d.
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 770
7.6
GeForce GTX 680
5.4
GeForce GTX 960
9.1
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
7

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 770
7.0
GeForce GTX 680
6.6
GeForce GTX 960
7.5

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 770
Front view of GeForce GTX 680

Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 26,525.5 More than 10% better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 192.3 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 33,025 Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 36.8 More than 2.2x higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 9,861 Around 15% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 64.7 fps Around 30% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 680

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Report a correction
Lower TDP 195W vs 230W More than 15% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 680

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680
123.57 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680
47.72 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,357.38
GeForce GTX 680
3,360.28

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
3,714.32
GeForce GTX 680
3,719.86

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 770
60.75
GeForce GTX 680
60.74

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 770
381.9
GeForce GTX 680
381.6

Thief

GeForce GTX 770
50
GeForce GTX 680
54.05

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 770
57.5
GeForce GTX 680
64.3

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 680 
9.6
read review
9.5
read review

Comments

Showing 17 comments.
dob iron (06:41 AM, August 19, 2015)
gotta love my msi gtx 670 power edition. still beats out a reference 770!
OscarTheTitan (11:44 PM, August 5, 2014)
Did you update your drivers?
MIGGI (11:46 PM, July 22, 2014)
GTX680 Top Edition smashes on gtx 770 .... intill you OC the 770 :/
Blastergamer (11:00 AM, May 7, 2014)
maybe your power supply doesn't meet the requirement, so your GPU uses less watts and has less performance.
Simon Lee (02:05 AM, May 1, 2014)
No. You clearly know nothing about bottlenecking. Please watch this. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAgpvWc4VBM
rupok (02:54 AM, March 11, 2014)
Its probably because your CPU is bottlenecking. You should get one of the newer i5's. Same thing is happening to me, I am going to upgrade to the i5 4670k soon.
Simon Lee (04:42 AM, March 6, 2014)
The GTX 680 has better turbo.boost.
Jon Sandsmark (12:39 AM, February 28, 2014)
a friend of mine has a gtx 680 and runs bf4 on ultra with 150% texture resolution with 70-110 fps. where as my gigabyte gtx 770 4gb OC runs at 30 fps if i have the same settings. wtf... im so confused! someone please shed light on this.
Max Wagner (02:02 PM, January 7, 2014)
got my inno3d with 1254mhz and this is stronger... but if you got a gtx 670 or 680 you can wait for 800series
Fonz (10:17 AM, August 21, 2013)
Hi, nice review here. How does the standard 770 compares with the 680 TOP Edition (1201Mhz)? Thanks
Филип Пешић (12:40 PM, July 10, 2013)
Yes, both 680 and 770 are GK104.. But.. Like they say.. 770 is 680 on steroids.. :D It's just better.. Plus GPU 2.0.. Of course.. Not reference 770.. Just custom.. Yes... It's badass looking.. But.. 80 C° ?? On full load.. NO.
Humble (05:03 AM, June 4, 2013)
On techtomorrow the GTX 770 had 7 more avg fps then the gtx 680 on 1080p. On the other games the GTX 770 also lead. The f is with this comparrison if not the drivers are the reason?
Humble (04:52 AM, June 4, 2013)
Keep in mind the maturity of the drivers.
KaRolthas (07:45 PM, June 3, 2013)
In 770vs670 comparasion we can see that in warhead 770 provides 48fps, and 670 36,4. In this one we can see 36,4 next to 770 what gives 50% advantage to 680 what is enermoud value. If there was 48 fps next to 770 it would give 11% advantage to 680 what is allright. Could you repair that?
Matthew Wroblewski (02:22 AM, June 3, 2013)
I just ordered a second GTX 680 for $420.00. This makes me feel pretty good about it...
akshay (12:05 PM, May 27, 2013)
yes its gtx 680 with gk104-400 i guess
i7Baby (05:10 AM, May 18, 2013)
I think the GTX770 will have GK104 - same as GTX 680 - according to other websites
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss