GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 690 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 915 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Better PassMark score 6,099 vs 5,331 Around 15% better PassMark score
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Better ocean surface simulation score 1,631.29 frames/s vs 1,403.86 frames/s More than 15% better ocean surface simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,083 vs 2,523 More than 20% better PassMark direct compute score
Lower TDP 230W vs 300W Around 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much higher memory bandwidth 384.6 GB/s vs 224 GB/s More than 70% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 17,380 vs 11,310 Around 55% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly better floating-point performance 5,621.8 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS Around 75% better floating-point performance
Significantly higher texture rate 234.2 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s Around 75% higher texture rate
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Many more texture mapping units 256 vs 128 Twice as many texture mapping units
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 41,180 vs 36,150 Around 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Many more shading units 3,072 vs 1,536 Twice as many shading units
Higher pixel rate 58.56 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s Around 75% higher pixel rate
Significantly more render output processors 64 vs 32 Twice as many render output processors
Much wider memory bus 512 bit vs 256 bit 2x wider memory bus
Significantly higher battlefield 4 framerate 117.5 vs 57.5 More than 2x higher battlefield 4 framerate
Better fire strike factor score 71.92 vs 60.75 Around 20% better fire strike factor score
Slightly better manhattan score 5,468 vs 3,714.32 More than 45% better manhattan score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 690

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
112.94 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 690
156.19 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770
50.95 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 690
44.37 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street


comments powered by Disqus