Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 770 vs 750 Ti Fake Card |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 750 Ti Fake Card among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770GPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 29,690 | vs | 1,887.5 | Around 15.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,150 | vs | 8,551 | Around 4.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better PassMark score | 6,099 | vs | 1,557 | Around 4x better PassMark score | |||
| Much higher memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | vs | 57.73 GB/s | Around 4x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 3,608 MHz | Around 95% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher clock speed | 1,046 MHz | vs | 783 MHz | Around 35% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 3,213 GFLOPS | vs | 601.3 GFLOPS | More than 5.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 134 GTexel/s | vs | 25.06 GTexel/s | More than 5.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Much better sky diver factor score | 381.9 | vs | 115.77 | More than 3.2x better sky diver factor score | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 32 | 96 more texture mapping units | |||
| Much better ocean surface simulation score | 1,631.29 frames/s | vs | 302.51 frames/s | Around 5.5x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 33.5 GPixel/s | vs | 6.26 GPixel/s | More than 5.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,536 | vs | 192 | 1344 more shading units | |||
| Much higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 902 MHz | Around 95% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,083 | vs | 716 | More than 4.2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 128 bit | 2x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,033.5 | vs | 11,310 | More than 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly lower TDP | 106W | vs | 230W | 2.2x lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 750 Ti Fake Card
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 280X vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 760 vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 680 vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 780 vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 7970 vs 770 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
