GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 760

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), battlefield 3 (2013) and Far Cry 3

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013), Passmark Direct Compute and 1 more

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 109.5 vs 82.8 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better passmark score 6,159 vs 4,973 Around 25% better passmark score
Higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 980 MHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 30,030 More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 24,480 More than 20% better 3DMark06 score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
More energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 336W More than 25% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 11,310 vs 8,730 Around 30% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 2,258 GFLOPS More than 40% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 94.1 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Significantly quieter idle noise level 38.2 dB vs 41 dB More than 5% quieter idle noise level
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 23.5 GPixel/s Around 45% higher pixel rate
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 192.3 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 50 dB More than 5% quieter load noise level
Significantly better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 395 vs 333.8 Around 20% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,032 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 128 vs 96 32 more texture mapping units
More shading units 1,536 vs 1,152 384 more shading units
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 68.2 fps More than 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher battlefield 3 framerate 126.2 fps vs 103.4 fps More than 20% higher battlefield 3 framerate
Higher far cry 3 framerate 50.4 fps vs 41.5 fps More than 20% higher far cry 3 framerate
Better CLBenchmark raytrace score 164,636 vs 130,616 More than 25% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Better passmark direct compute score 3,024 vs 2,320 More than 30% better passmark direct compute score
Higher crysis: warhead framerate 57 fps vs 49.8 fps Around 15% higher crysis: warhead framerate
More SMX units 8 vs 6 2 more SMX units
Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Lower TDP 170W vs 230W More than 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 760

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 770 GeForce GTX 760 @ community.futuremark.com

Crysis: Warhead (2013) 1920x1080 - Enthusiast Quality + 4xAA

Far Cry 3 1920 x 1080 - Ultra Quality + 4x MSAA + Enh. AtoC

GeForce GTX 770
50.4 fps
GeForce GTX 760
41.5 fps

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 770
83.4 fps
GeForce GTX 760
68.2 fps

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 760 

9.6
9.0
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

Showing 12 comments.
with current prices (sale prices etc) the price difference is about 70$, might be worth the difference now
i can get my 760 to 1.3ghz if i need it and plan to sli later when i build my next rig... the extra dosh didn't seem worth it right now to go with a 770 or 780 and my current cpu nearly bottlenecks the 760 as it is. I can get up to 45fps on farcry3 with max settings and my cpu is a a8 5600k clocked at 4.2ghz with 8gb of ram
well MicroCenter Here in Ohio has NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Superclocked for 369.99$
i WOULD SAY its more of stable hardware. It cant be just fps it has various factors including future games demanding more of features need a stable hardware to enjoy atleast a 1080p/1200p resolution ultra setting with 40+ fps so if even a huge degrage will be not less than 20 fps at extreme scene hope the decision is based on funds if you want to save 100 and add one more later its well and gud.
ASUS GTX 760 or ASUS GTX 770? In Canada, the 770 costs $100 more, and I'm using a ASUS mobo and i5 4670K, so it already cost me $1000. I want it to be as cheap as possible. I think 60 FPS is pretty good already.
10fps makes a big difference...but I agree, $110 more is a bit over-the-top.
im poor ill just stay with the 760
760's price impresses me, even as a 770 owner.
110$ more for 10fps more (average ) mmm ...
770 is the best on
Join the discussion.
i'll go with the 770.
comments powered by Disqus