GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770 vs 760 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

GeForce GTX 770
7.5
GeForce GTX 760
6.5
GeForce GTX 960
6.9
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 770
6.4
GeForce GTX 760
n.d.
GeForce GTX 960
8.0
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

GeForce GTX 770
6.8
GeForce GTX 760
n.d.
GeForce GTX 960
6.4
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 770
7.0
GeForce GTX 760
7.1
GeForce GTX 960
8.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

GeForce GTX 770
5.2
GeForce GTX 760
5.1
GeForce GTX 960
5.3
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 770
8.4
GeForce GTX 760
8.6
GeForce GTX 960
9.1
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
6.8

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 770
6.8
GeForce GTX 760
6.5
GeForce GTX 960
7.1

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Front view of GeForce GTX 770
Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 7,962 Around 3.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 36,150 vs 30,123 More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 224 GB/s vs 192.3 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,012 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 3,213 GFLOPS vs 2,257.9 GFLOPS More than 40% better floating-point performance
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 84 vs 33.3 More than 2.5x higher crysis 3 framerate
Higher texture rate 134 GTexel/s vs 94.1 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Higher pixel rate 33.5 GPixel/s vs 23.52 GPixel/s More than 40% higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 128 vs 96 32 more texture mapping units
More shading units 1,536 vs 1,152 384 more shading units
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.4 fps vs 68.2 fps More than 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,753 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Front view of GeForce GTX 760

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 760

Report a correction
Lower TDP 170W vs 230W More than 25% lower TDP

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770 vs 760

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 770
36,150
GeForce GTX 760
30,123

3DMark06 Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 9 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 770
29,690
GeForce GTX 760
7,962

Thief

GeForce GTX 770
50
GeForce GTX 760
39.2

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 770
57.5
GeForce GTX 760
49.3

Crysis 3

GeForce GTX 770
84
GeForce GTX 760
33.3

Metro: Last Light

GeForce GTX 770
70
GeForce GTX 760
29.4

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 770
83.4 fps
GeForce GTX 760
68.2 fps

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 770  vs 760 
9.6
read review
9.0
read review
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

Showing 15 comments.
Ares-the-Great (01:52 PM, January 21, 2016)
No... it doesn't... the base clocks are: 760 = 980 MHz | 770 = 1 GHz (1,000 MHz). Which means the 770 is only base clocked 20 MHz higher. Stupid.
Draven (09:36 PM, February 23, 2015)
i think my 760 is good enough i don't see a very noticeable difference
Mishka (09:32 PM, January 31, 2015)
I think gtx 760 is really poweful so I'll just stay with it.plus difference between these two is only that 770 has 1000 more MHz than 760
Des (06:49 PM, August 6, 2014)
with current prices (sale prices etc) the price difference is about 70$, might be worth the difference now
joe (02:03 PM, May 7, 2014)
i can get my 760 to 1.3ghz if i need it and plan to sli later when i build my next rig... the extra dosh didn't seem worth it right now to go with a 770 or 780 and my current cpu nearly bottlenecks the 760 as it is. I can get up to 45fps on farcry3 with max settings and my cpu is a a8 5600k clocked at 4.2ghz with 8gb of ram
ctp133 (03:40 AM, April 18, 2014)
well MicroCenter Here in Ohio has NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Superclocked for 369.99$
ulaganath KRISHANSAMY (05:55 PM, April 5, 2014)
i WOULD SAY its more of stable hardware. It cant be just fps it has various factors including future games demanding more of features need a stable hardware to enjoy atleast a 1080p/1200p resolution ultra setting with 40+ fps so if even a huge degrage will be not less than 20 fps at extreme scene hope the decision is based on funds if you want to save 100 and add one more later its well and gud.
Simon Lee (04:24 AM, March 23, 2014)
ASUS GTX 760 or ASUS GTX 770? In Canada, the 770 costs $100 more, and I'm using a ASUS mobo and i5 4670K, so it already cost me $1000. I want it to be as cheap as possible. I think 60 FPS is pretty good already.
ZeroSbr (01:23 PM, February 26, 2014)
10fps makes a big difference...but I agree, $110 more is a bit over-the-top.
anthony (12:22 PM, February 18, 2014)
im poor ill just stay with the 760
Fullname J Warrington (07:01 AM, February 18, 2014)
760's price impresses me, even as a 770 owner.
claimore22 (09:27 PM, January 29, 2014)
110$ more for 10fps more (average ) mmm ...
PcExpert (02:17 PM, January 22, 2014)
770 is the best on
zikao (08:59 PM, November 21, 2013)
Join the discussion.
zika (08:58 PM, November 21, 2013)
i'll go with the 770.
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss