Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 770M vs 580M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 580M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 0.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 22,486 | vs | 3,116.5 | Around 7.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 141.3 fps | vs | 70.9 fps | Around 2x higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 18,137.5 | vs | 13,315 | More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,638 | vs | 2,286 | More than 15% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 706 MHz | vs | 620 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,008 MHz | vs | 3,000 MHz | Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 960 | vs | 384 | 576 more shading units | |||
| Better particle simulation score | 273.2 mInteraction/s | vs | 149.24 mInteraction/s | Around 85% better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher texture rate | 56.5 GTexel/s | vs | 39.7 GTexel/s | More than 40% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 750 MHz | Around 35% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,486 | vs | 954 | More than 55% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 20,550.5 | vs | 4,955 | Around 4.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly better T-Rex score | 3,358.98 | vs | 3,352.7 | Almost the same | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 580M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Battlefield 3
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 860M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 765M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 870M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 780M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 960M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 770 vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 8970M vs 770M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
