GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 670


Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite and Crysis 3


Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Nvidia GeForce GTX 670 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 670  based on its gaming.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M

Report a correction
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Lower TDP 75W vs 170W 2.3x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 670

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 670

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 706 MHz Around 30% higher clock speed
Better passmark score 5,382 vs 2,903 More than 85% better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 31,610 vs 18,137.5 Around 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 4,008 MHz Around 50% higher effective memory clock speed
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,600 vs 4,955 Around 95% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better 3DMark06 score 29,150 vs 22,486 Around 30% better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 96.2 GB/s Around 2x higher memory bandwidth
Better floating-point performance 2,460 GFLOPS vs 1,356 GFLOPS More than 80% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 102.5 GTexel/s vs 56.5 GTexel/s More than 80% higher texture rate
Significantly higher turbo clock speed 980 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 25% higher turbo clock speed
Much higher BioShock infinite framerate 83.7 fps vs 29.43 fps More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher pixel rate 25.6 GPixel/s vs 14.1 GPixel/s More than 80% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 59.9 fps vs 19.55 fps More than 3x higher crysis 3 framerate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,002 MHz Around 50% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 112 vs 80 32 more texture mapping units
Better passmark direct compute score 2,557 vs 1,464 Around 75% better passmark direct compute score
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
More shading units 1,344 vs 960 384 more shading units
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 670

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 770M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark11 puts the GTX 770 slightly ahead of both the GTX 680 and the Radeon HD 7970 - an edge of 11% over the AMD offering.
GeForce GTX 770M | by Ryan-Shrout (May, 2013)

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

Despite an 88% scaling rate on the standard and extreme presets by adding in a second GTX 770 card, the AMD CrossFire solution still produces a better score in latest version of 3DMark.
GeForce GTX 770M | by Ryan-Shrout (May, 2013)

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 770M
29.43 fps
GeForce GTX 670
83.7 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 770M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA

GeForce GTX 770M
19.55 fps
GeForce GTX 670
59.9 fps
The HD 7970s in CrossFire had issues in BF3, Crysis 3, Far Cry 3 and Sleeping Dogs with nearly every other frame alternating between high and low frame times - the result is an animation that is either stuttering or at a much lower perceived frame rate than you should be getting for your GPU investment.
GeForce GTX 770M | by Ryan-Shrout (May, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute


comments powered by Disqus