GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 675M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 2,638 vs 2,142 Around 25% better PassMark score
Much higher diablo III framerate 141.3 fps vs 73.91 fps More than 90% higher diablo III framerate
Better 3DMark06 score 22,486 vs 20,452.5 Around 10% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 18,137.5 vs 13,805 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher clock speed 706 MHz vs 620 MHz Around 15% higher clock speed
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Higher effective memory clock speed 4,008 MHz vs 3,000 MHz Around 35% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 4,955 vs 3,218 Around 55% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate 19.55 fps vs 13.9 fps More than 40% higher crysis 3 framerate
More shading units 960 vs 384 576 more shading units
Better particle simulation score 273.2 mInteraction/s vs 158.5 mInteraction/s More than 70% better particle simulation score
Better T-Rex score 3,352.7 vs 3,350.04 Almost the same
Higher texture rate 56.5 GTexel/s vs 39.7 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 750 MHz Around 35% higher memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 80 vs 64 16 more texture mapping units
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,486 vs 1,021 More than 45% better PassMark direct compute score
Better sky diver factor score 257.36 vs 189.12 More than 35% better sky diver factor score
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 675M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 675M

Report a correction
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 675M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770M
87.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 675M
59.01 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770M
29.53 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 675M
22.12 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Bioshock Infinite

Crysis 3

Comments

comments powered by Disqus