GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 680M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 770M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 22,486 vs 5,897.5 More than 3.8x better 3DMark06 score
Better T-Rex score 3,390.08 vs 3,109.39 Around 10% better T-Rex score
Higher turbo clock speed 797 MHz vs 719 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
Higher memory clock speed 1,002 MHz vs 900 MHz More than 10% higher memory clock speed
Lower TDP 75W vs 100W 25% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 680M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,760 vs 4,955 More than 4.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better PassMark score 3,377 vs 2,638 Around 30% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 20,891 vs 18,137.5 More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Better floating-point performance 1,932.7 GFLOPS vs 1,355.5 GFLOPS Around 45% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 80.5 GTexel/s vs 56.5 GTexel/s More than 40% higher texture rate
Significantly higher diablo III framerate 157.25 fps vs 141.3 fps More than 10% higher diablo III framerate
Slightly higher memory bandwidth 115.2 GB/s vs 96.2 GB/s Around 20% higher memory bandwidth
More texture mapping units 112 vs 80 32 more texture mapping units
More shading units 1,344 vs 960 384 more shading units
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 45.8 fps vs 29.43 fps More than 55% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More render output processors 32 vs 24 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 256 bit vs 192 bit Around 35% wider memory bus
Higher metro: last light framerate 30.5 vs 23 Around 35% higher metro: last light framerate
Higher crysis 3 framerate 21.8 fps vs 19.55 fps More than 10% higher crysis 3 framerate
Better particle simulation score 327.68 mInteraction/s vs 273.2 mInteraction/s Around 20% better particle simulation score
Better PassMark direct compute score 1,775 vs 1,486 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 680M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770M
87.66 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680M
99.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 770M
29.53 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680M
28.08 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus