GeForce GTX 770M vs 680M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
- 706 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)The flagship GTX 780M is essentially a desktop GTX 680 card in a mobile form factor with lower clock speeds.
VS
Released June, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M
- 719 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
6.9 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)Besides the above slide, NVIDIA provided some performance estimates using results from the 3DMark 11 Performance benchmark, and the results are even more heavily in favor of NVIDIA.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 680M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 22,486 | vs | 5,897.5 | More than 3.8x better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better T-Rex score | 3,390.08 | vs | 3,109.39 | Around 10% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 719 MHz | More than 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,002 MHz | vs | 900 MHz | More than 10% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 22,760 | vs | 4,955 | More than 4.5x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 3,377 | vs | 2,638 | Around 30% better PassMark score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 20,891 | vs | 18,137.5 | More than 15% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 1,932.7 GFLOPS | vs | 1,355.5 GFLOPS | Around 45% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 80.5 GTexel/s | vs | 56.5 GTexel/s | More than 40% higher texture rate | |||
| Slightly higher memory bandwidth | 115.2 GB/s | vs | 96.2 GB/s | Around 20% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher diablo III framerate | 157.25 fps | vs | 141.3 fps | More than 10% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 112 | vs | 80 | 32 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,344 | vs | 960 | 384 more shading units | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 45.8 fps | vs | 29.43 fps | More than 55% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 21.8 fps | vs | 19.55 fps | More than 10% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 680M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 770M vs 860M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770M vs 765M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770M vs 960M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770M vs 870M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770M vs 780M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 770M vs 770 | ||
 | VS | |
| 680M vs 780M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1050 vs MX150 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $291 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $291 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1080 vs Pro 580 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
