Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 770M vs 765M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
- 706 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2013)Meanwhile the GTX 770’s 10% gain over the GTX 680 is solid and once again memory bandwidth likely plays a factor, while against the GTX 570 it’s ahead by 76.
VS
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 765M
- 797 MHz
- 2 GB GDDR5
6.5 Out of 10
by Jarred-Walton (Apr, 2013)As for the Boost clocks, in practice that can increase the GPU core speed 15% or more over the normal value, with most games realizing a 10-15% performance thanks to the increase.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 765M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 2,638 | vs | 1,874 | More than 40% better PassMark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark06 score | 22,486 | vs | 19,624 | Around 15% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 18,137.5 | vs | 13,390 | More than 35% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 141.3 fps | vs | 111.7 fps | More than 25% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 96.2 GB/s | vs | 64.1 GB/s | More than 50% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly better particle simulation score | 273.2 mInteraction/s | vs | 101.59 mInteraction/s | Around 2.8x better particle simulation score | |||
| Significantly higher crysis 3 framerate | 19.55 fps | vs | 14.2 fps | Around 40% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Wider memory bus | 192 bit | vs | 128 bit | 50% wider memory bus | |||
| More texture mapping units | 80 | vs | 64 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly more shading units | 960 | vs | 768 | 192 more shading units | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 23 | vs | 18.2 | More than 25% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 29.43 fps | vs | 23.25 fps | More than 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,486 | vs | 1,273 | More than 15% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 797 MHz | vs | 706 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 863 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 10% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 765M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 4 laptops with the GeForce GTX 770M, starting from $1,700
- 6 laptops with the GeForce GTX 765M, starting from $1,650
