Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 770 based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 770M vs 770 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 770M vs 770 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.8 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 770GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower TDP | 75W | vs | 230W | 3.1x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Better PassMark score | 6,099 | vs | 2,638 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 1,046 MHz | vs | 706 MHz | Around 50% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 36,150 | vs | 18,137.5 | Around 2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark06 score | 29,690 | vs | 22,486 | More than 30% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 7,012 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | Around 75% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 224 GB/s | vs | 96.2 GB/s | More than 2.2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 11,310 | vs | 4,955 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,213 GFLOPS | vs | 1,355.5 GFLOPS | More than 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 134 GTexel/s | vs | 56.5 GTexel/s | More than 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 33.5 GPixel/s | vs | 14.12 GPixel/s | More than 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly better sky diver factor score | 381.9 | vs | 257.36 | Around 50% better sky diver factor score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,085 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | More than 35% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 1,631.29 frames/s | vs | 731.76 frames/s | Around 2.2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,753 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | Around 75% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher metro: last light framerate | 70 | vs | 23 | More than 3x higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 83.4 fps | vs | 29.43 fps | More than 2.8x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 960 | 576 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,083 | vs | 1,486 | More than 2x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 770M vs 770
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 4 laptops with the GeForce GTX 770M, starting from $1,700
- 7 desktops with the GeForce GTX 770, starting from $2,420
