GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 690 among Desktop GPUs

Gaming

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.4
GeForce GTX 690
9.0
GeForce GTX 970
8.3
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.2
GeForce GTX 690
9.4
GeForce GTX 970
8.2
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
7.9
GeForce GTX 690
6.6
GeForce GTX 970
7.7
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
7.8
GeForce GTX 690
7.6
GeForce GTX 970
8.7
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Value

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
5.8
GeForce GTX 690
n.d.
GeForce GTX 970
6.1
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.1
GeForce GTX 690
6.6
GeForce GTX 970
8.8
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more
8.3

Overall Score

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
7.9
GeForce GTX 690
8.3
GeForce GTX 970
8.1

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 690  based on its benchmarks.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 80W vs 132W Around 40% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better PassMark score 8,968 vs 5,271 More than 70% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 41,180 More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Better T-Rex score 8.59 frames/s vs 4.37 frames/s More than 95% better T-Rex score
Higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 396 vs 376 More than 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Higher crysis 3 framerate 60.3 vs 53 Around 15% higher crysis 3 framerate
Lower TDP 250W vs 300W More than 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Much better 3DMark06 score 30,360 vs 15,619 Around 95% better 3DMark06 score
Higher memory bandwidth 384.6 GB/s vs 336 GB/s Around 15% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 17,380 vs 15,630 More than 10% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Significantly better T-Rex score 5,028 vs 3,359.74 Around 50% better T-Rex score
More render output processors 64 vs 48 16 more render output processors
Higher texture rate 234.2 GTexel/s vs 210 GTexel/s More than 10% higher texture rate
Slightly more texture mapping units 256 vs 240 16 more texture mapping units
More SMX units 16 vs 15 1 more SMX units

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 690

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
322.5 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 690
154.68 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
85.83 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 690
44.31 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3,359.74
GeForce GTX 690
5,028

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
3,718.04
GeForce GTX 690
5,468

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
88.61
GeForce GTX 690
85.54

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
431.4
GeForce GTX 690
430.68

Battlefield 4

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
89
GeForce GTX 690
117.5

Crysis 3

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
60.3
GeForce GTX 690
53

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 780 Ti  vs 690 
9.4
read review
9.5
read review
Each GPU further has a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, with which it talks to 2 GB of memory.
GeForce GTX 690

Comments

Showing 8 comments.
kickassperf (06:02 AM, March 24, 2016)
the fuckig problem with nvida is VRAM ! 970 3.5 gb 780 ti only 3gb yes this card are amazing buy i have sell my 780ti cuz i need mon vram for gta v nvidia gpu very good buy vram too bad like 680 2gb gtx 960 2gb nvidia kick ass in small time but for the long time buy amd sorry fan boys im bad in english 2 years later after you buy nvdia you need more memory this is why your bottleneck your system like gta v yes amd need more watt i know this amd driver are good people hate amd are so stupid stop fanboy
Emerald_Shine5850 (12:19 AM, October 7, 2015)
The least you will need for gaming is 2gb. 3gb is more than enough and it has more CUDA cores than the 690. If you get a gtx 780 Ti Classified k|ngp|n, you will get more performance than a gtx 980 and almost as much as the Titan but for like $200-$300 less.
filoippo97 (04:28 PM, July 20, 2014)
Wrong. It's a sli, no matter what type it is, and the rules are the same. Every gpu in a sli work on the same data at the same time, so every chip must have a copy of this data in its vram for easy access. The sli bridge only coordinates the final data flow of every graphics card. (in fact the 690 is surclassed for 4K gaming for low memory)
n/a (01:08 AM, July 14, 2014)
That only applies to bridged SLI. not single silicon dual GPUs.
filoippo97 (10:34 AM, June 21, 2014)
The VRAM available on the gtx 690 is incorrect. The real memory is 2Gb not 4Gb. This is because in sli the memory isn't summed, remains the same as the single card.
Jett Angeles (01:12 PM, May 15, 2014)
The VRAM is the only thing holding me back from getting the 780 Ti. More and more games are needing more memory, and I want to future proof my rig as much as possible, 3GB is just not going to be enough.
ZeroSbr (01:29 PM, February 26, 2014)
780 Ti is probably the better choice for now. The only true negative I see is less VRAM, but 3GB is still more than enough.
Ross Magerus (04:05 AM, February 18, 2014)
I think I will stay with my Evga factory Superclocked 780 TI, since it's about 15% overclocked (1007 base clock)
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss