Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti based on its benchmarks, compute performance and noise and power.
See full details | GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 690 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.6 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 TiGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
| |||||||
Significantly better PassMark score | 8,890 | vs | 5,331 | More than 65% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 46,186 | vs | 41,180 | More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 2,201.43 frames/s | vs | 1,403.86 frames/s | More than 55% better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 4,688 | vs | 2,523 | More than 85% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Higher crysis 3 framerate | 60.3 | vs | 53 | Around 15% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Lower TDP | 250W | vs | 300W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 30,360 | vs | 15,619 | Around 95% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 384.6 GB/s | vs | 336 GB/s | Around 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 17,380 | vs | 15,630 | More than 10% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Better floating-point performance | 5,621.8 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Higher texture rate | 234.2 GTexel/s | vs | 210 GTexel/s | More than 10% higher texture rate | |||
Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
More texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 240 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
Slightly more shading units | 3,072 | vs | 2,880 | 192 more shading units | |||
Slightly better manhattan score | 5,468 | vs | 3,713.92 | More than 45% better manhattan score |
GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | 690 | ||
![]() | 9.4 | 9.5 |
---|