GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 690 |
Released November, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti
- 875 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
9.5 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!Since it's the displays that dictate refresh rates, it's always been the GPU's job to ensure the display output is fluid, by deploying technologies such as V-Sync (vertical sync).
VS
Released May, 2012
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690
- 915 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
8.6 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (May, 2012)But with its screaming performance, the noise levels are an acceptable tradeoff and GTX 690 is still much quieter than any competing multi-GPU setup that can provide similar FPS numbers.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 690
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and Passmark Direct Compute | |
Noise and Power | |
How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load | |
| TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly better passmark score | 8,676 | vs | 5,168 | Around 70% better passmark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption | 80W | vs | 132W | Around 40% more energy-efficient idle power consumption | |||
| Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption | 372W | vs | 472W | More than 20% more energy-efficient load power consumption | |||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 35,190 | vs | 30,360 | More than 15% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 44,390 | vs | 41,180 | Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly better passmark direct compute score | 4,781 | vs | 2,552 | More than 85% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Quieter load noise level | 51.7 dB | vs | 54.5 dB | More than 5% quieter load noise level | |||
| Quieter idle noise level | 38.6 dB | vs | 40 dB | Around 5% quieter idle noise level | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | 396 | vs | 376 | More than 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score | |||
| Lower TDP | 250W | vs | 300W | More than 15% lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Is dual GPU | Yes | vs | No | About half of graphics cards are dual GPU | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Higher clock speed | 915 MHz | vs | 875 MHz | Around 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 384.6 GB/s | vs | 336 GB/s | Around 15% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 17,380 | vs | 15,630 | More than 10% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 5,622 GFLOPS | vs | 5,040 GFLOPS | More than 10% better floating-point performance | |||
| More render output processors | 64 | vs | 48 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Higher texture rate | 234.2 GTexel/s | vs | 210 GTexel/s | More than 10% higher texture rate | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 58.6 GPixel/s | vs | 52.5 GPixel/s | More than 10% higher pixel rate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 512 bit | vs | 384 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Slightly more texture mapping units | 256 | vs | 240 | 16 more texture mapping units | |||
| More SMX units | 16 | vs | 15 | 1 more SMX units | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 690
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance
Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 780 Ti | vs | 690 | ||
 | GeForce GTX 690 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 2 comments.
