GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 690

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
N/A
GeForce GTX 690
N/A
crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
9.0
GeForce GTX 690
9.0
Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.4
GeForce GTX 690
7.8
Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.4
GeForce GTX 690
7.8
TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks, Compute Performance and Noise and Power
GeForce GTX 780 Ti
8.5
GeForce GTX 690
8.2

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti  based on its .

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

GPUBoss Winner
 Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti
Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better passmark score 9,034 vs 5,194 Around 75% better passmark score
Much more energy-efficient idle power consumption 80W vs 132W Around 40% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 41,180 More than 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 372W vs 472W More than 20% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Significantly better passmark direct compute score 4,637 vs 2,526 Around 85% better passmark direct compute score
Quieter load noise level 51.7 dB vs 54.5 dB More than 5% quieter load noise level
Quieter idle noise level 38.6 dB vs 40 dB Around 5% quieter idle noise level
Higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score 396 vs 376 More than 5% better civilization 5 texture decomposition (2013) score
Lower TDP 250W vs 300W More than 15% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 690

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 690

Report a correction
Is dual GPU Yes vs No About half of graphics cards are dual GPU
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 30,360 vs 15,619 Around 95% better 3DMark06 score
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Slightly higher clock speed 915 MHz vs 875 MHz Around 5% higher clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 384.6 GB/s vs 336 GB/s Around 15% higher memory bandwidth
Slightly better floating-point performance 5,622 GFLOPS vs 5,040 GFLOPS More than 10% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 234.2 GTexel/s vs 210 GTexel/s More than 10% higher texture rate
More render output processors 64 vs 48 16 more render output processors
Slightly higher pixel rate 58.6 GPixel/s vs 52.5 GPixel/s More than 10% higher pixel rate
Wider memory bus 512 bit vs 384 bit Around 35% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 690

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
9,034
GeForce GTX 690
5,194
videocardbenchmark.net

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
173.1
GeForce GTX 690
183.4
GeForce GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 690 @ anandtech.com

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
15,630
GeForce GTX 690
17,380
GeForce GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 690 @ community.futuremark.com

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
46,186
GeForce GTX 690
41,180
GeForce GTX 690 @ community.futuremark.com
GeForce GTX 780 Ti @ notebookcheck.net

Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
396
GeForce GTX 690
376
GeForce GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 690 @ anandtech.com

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
4,637
GeForce GTX 690
2,526
videocardbenchmark.net

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 780 Ti  vs 690 
9.4
read review
9.5
read review
Each GPU further has a 256-bit wide GDDR5 memory interface, with which it talks to 2 GB of memory.
GeForce GTX 690

Comments

Showing 6 comments.
filoippo97 (04:28 PM, July 20, 2014)
Wrong. It's a sli, no matter what type it is, and the rules are the same. Every gpu in a sli work on the same data at the same time, so every chip must have a copy of this data in its vram for easy access. The sli bridge only coordinates the final data flow of every graphics card. (in fact the 690 is surclassed for 4K gaming for low memory)
n/a (01:08 AM, July 14, 2014)
That only applies to bridged SLI. not single silicon dual GPUs.
filoippo97 (10:34 AM, June 21, 2014)
The VRAM available on the gtx 690 is incorrect. The real memory is 2Gb not 4Gb. This is because in sli the memory isn't summed, remains the same as the single card.
Jett Angeles (01:12 PM, May 15, 2014)
The VRAM is the only thing holding me back from getting the 780 Ti. More and more games are needing more memory, and I want to future proof my rig as much as possible, 3GB is just not going to be enough.
ZeroSbr (01:29 PM, February 26, 2014)
780 Ti is probably the better choice for now. The only true negative I see is less VRAM, but 3GB is still more than enough.
Ross Magerus (04:05 AM, February 18, 2014)
I think I will stay with my Evga factory Superclocked 780 TI, since it's about 15% overclocked (1007 base clock)
comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

GPUBoss