GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 770

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

crysis: warhead (2013), Crysis: Warhead (2012), Batman: Arkham City and 6 more

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark Vantage Texture Fill, 3DMark 11 Graphics and 2 more

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Civilization 5 Texture Decomposition (2013) and Passmark Direct Compute

Noise and Power

How loud and hot does the card run idle and under load

TDP, Idle Noise Level, Load Noise Level, Idle Power Consumption and 1 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 173.1 vs 109.5 Around 60% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better passmark score 9,016 vs 6,159 More than 45% better passmark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 36,150 Around 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 224 GB/s 50% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,630 vs 11,310 Around 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Better floating-point performance 5,040 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS More than 55% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 210 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s More than 55% higher texture rate
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Significantly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 80W vs 109W More than 25% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Higher pixel rate 52.5 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s More than 55% higher pixel rate
Significantly more texture mapping units 240 vs 128 112 more texture mapping units
Significantly more shading units 2,880 vs 1,536 1344 more shading units
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 116.4 fps vs 83.4 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better passmark direct compute score 4,639 vs 3,025 Around 55% better passmark direct compute score
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus
Significantly more SMX units 15 vs 8 7 more SMX units
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 875 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 15,619 More than 90% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 372W Around 35% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 51.7 dB Around 10% quieter load noise level
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,020 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 770

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

3DMark Vantage (Texture Fill) Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX performance

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

GeForce GTX 780 Ti GeForce GTX 770 @ community.futuremark.com

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
116.4 fps
GeForce GTX 770
83.4 fps

Civilization 5 Texture Decomp (2013) Using the newest graphics cards Civ V can speed screen transitions by reducing texture sizes

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 780 Ti  vs 770 

9.4
9.6
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Cool.
comments powered by Disqus