GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 770 among Desktop GPUs over $400

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.8

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Significantly better 3DMark vantage texture fill score 173.1 vs 109.5 Around 60% better 3DMark vantage texture fill score
Better PassMark score 8,963 vs 6,147 More than 45% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 36,150 Around 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 224 GB/s 50% higher memory bandwidth
Significantly more energy-efficient idle power consumption 80W vs 109W More than 25% more energy-efficient idle power consumption
Better floating-point performance 5,040 GFLOPS vs 3,213 GFLOPS More than 55% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 210 GTexel/s vs 134 GTexel/s More than 55% higher texture rate
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,630 vs 11,310 Around 40% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Significantly more texture mapping units 240 vs 128 112 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 52.5 GPixel/s vs 33.5 GPixel/s More than 55% higher pixel rate
More shading units 2,880 vs 1,536 1344 more shading units
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 116.4 fps vs 83.4 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Better PassMark direct compute score 4,651 vs 3,012 Around 55% better PassMark direct compute score
Many more SMX units 15 vs 8 7 more SMX units
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 89 vs 57.5 Around 55% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Better video composition score 62.42 frames/s vs 49.37 frames/s More than 25% better video composition score
Better cloud gate factor score 22.05 vs 20.81 More than 5% better cloud gate factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 770

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 29,690 vs 15,619 More than 90% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly higher clock speed 1,046 MHz vs 875 MHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Significantly more energy-efficient load power consumption 246W vs 372W Around 35% more energy-efficient load power consumption
Quieter load noise level 46.7 dB vs 51.7 dB Around 10% quieter load noise level
Higher turbo clock speed 1,085 MHz vs 1,020 MHz More than 5% higher turbo clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 770

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
179.53 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 770
103.87 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
71.49 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 770
43.78 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Reviews Word on the street

GeForce GTX 780 Ti  vs 770 

9.4
9.6
The GTX 770 WindForce OC is no different, but the improvement over the reference design cooler is, nevertheless, not that big because NVIDIA's cooler is already quite good.
GeForce GTX 770

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
Cool.
comments powered by Disqus