GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 Ti vs 780 among Desktop GPUs


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more


T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more


Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more


Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 Ti

Report a correction
Higher memory bandwidth 336 GB/s vs 288.4 GB/s More than 15% higher memory bandwidth
Better PassMark score 8,890 vs 7,976 More than 10% better PassMark score
Higher effective memory clock speed 7,000 MHz vs 6,008 MHz More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed
Better floating-point performance 5,040 GFLOPS vs 3,977 GFLOPS More than 25% better floating-point performance
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 46,186 vs 42,870 Around 10% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher texture rate 210 GTexel/s vs 165.7 GTexel/s More than 25% higher texture rate
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 15,630 vs 14,020 More than 10% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
More texture mapping units 240 vs 192 48 more texture mapping units
Higher pixel rate 52.5 GPixel/s vs 41.4 GPixel/s More than 25% higher pixel rate
More shading units 2,880 vs 2,304 576 more shading units
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 116.4 fps vs 95.3 fps More than 20% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,752 MHz vs 1,502 MHz More than 15% higher memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 1,020 MHz vs 902 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Better PassMark direct compute score 4,688 vs 3,971 Around 20% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher battlefield 4 framerate 85.4 vs 74 More than 15% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Front view of GeForce GTX 780

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 35,080 vs 15,619 Around 2.2x better 3DMark06 score
Better particle simulation score 966.29 mInteraction/s vs 764.93 mInteraction/s More than 25% better particle simulation score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 Ti vs 780

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
182.11 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780
255.31 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
75.43 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780
57.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
2,201.43 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
1,928.62 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
764.93 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780
966.29 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
6.85 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
5.49 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780 Ti
58.07 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
91.16 frames/s

Battlefield 4

Reviews Word on the street


Showing 25 comments.
Its worth the money if you playing at res more then 1440p with the eye candy turned up. 4k you'll end up hitting a vram bottleneck, but even then the ti will give better min at a 1440p res then the normal 780. You have to remember that not everyone games at 720 or 1080p at 60hz these days, I own 2x 780ti's and use a 1080p 144hz BenQ monitor, and there are some games that wont hit that smooth 144hz. So its worth it to some extent.
Its a close call against my INNO 3D iChiLL GTX780. That is very close to the Ti. Its why I`m considering SLi or the new Gigabyte GTX980 G1 Gaming; a 6Gb VRAM card. But, we will see what the R9 390X has on offer when its released real soon.
On my Haswell i5 back-up gaming rig, my ASUS R9 280 in Crossfire kick the living daylights out of an R9 290X (and my Haswell i7 GTX780 gaming rig), and they are cheaper per pair still than either competitor mentioned.. Enjoy.
I am seriously considering going iChiLL 780 SLi this month. Will it whup @ss the Ti?
No, more like 15-22% but yeah its still a nice improvement. If you are rich like you are, it's a good upgrade. But if you are middle class or so, you would not buy TI rather than 780, other than in your dreams. And people who arent avarage, they wouldnt even have money to buy GTX 780.
it still not worth the money
hah... this test and comparison sucks! i had GTX780 and i have GTX780Ti... there is big difference between this two cards! arround 20-25%
ive had 2 MSI R9 290x cards and both had the black screen of death. i now have a GTX 780 which im more than happy with.
Its almost the same bro.... Have the SAME exactly chip,memory...etc If you want to spent 200 dollars more for a 500 f*cking cuda cores more and some 50 memory badwitch\texture fill rate more, then buy the the "To idiots" (ti) edition. I have the Non ti and its VERY Enough even on high resolutions monitors for gaming and im VERY HAPPY to dealing with 480$.
Usually the rule of thumb is never buy an Nvidia card with letters at the end of the name... Save yourself hundreds of dollars and just buy the base model and then overclock is slightly.
I don't know what to do. GTX 780 ti or GTX 780.
The word "ti" of the nvidia models means 200 dollars more. (Ti=To Idiots) who like to spent for no reason, money,
Sorry but YOU'RE stupid for not even knowing the proper use of YOUR and YOU'RE (You Are).
not really. if anything, you seem a little "retarded" after stating what you'd said. understandably, ati cards aren't the most powerful things around, however for a lighter price tag compared to some of the nvidia cards that perform around the same. i myself am running a gigabyte 7870 in my machine and it runs superbly for costing me around $200 Australian dollars and competes fairly similar to my brothers 660 ti.
pfft common...any idiot knows its all about the cuda cores that determines graphics power...780 cuda core cost about 21cents/per, while 780ti cost about 24cents/per...
Sorry for late reply... I can't actually afford the SLI, or the 780 for that matter. I was just wondering but thanks for the help. I'll keep that in mind when I build a better computer :)
if you buy AMD parts for gaming, you must be at least slightly retarded to believe that shit
its miles better than the 780. $200 is nothing
Top kek another uninformed sheep sprouting 10 year old meme's as fact "Utilise so much of the card" - I literally had to burst out laughing IRL. The fact that you actually believe this is hilarious.
oh and gl with sli issues... better to get off with a 780 or 780 ti than a sli because it causes issues in games and you will also need g sync because you will get screen tearing if you are running a 1080p or even 1440p for some games.... i would be better off getting a 780 or a 780 ti than 2 760's because in the future i could add another 780 or 780 ti and you could add a 760 but most games arent so well optimized for 3 way sli anyways... just a tip. Plus if you were to go 760... defnetly go 4gb because you are obviusly gonna go 1440p or 1600p right ? or else your just being tottaly dumb for actully going does not simply do sli on 1080p... that is what i call being dumb. So anyways my point is that you're better off with a 780 or a 780 ti than 2 cards in sli because as I mentioned the sli issues... and also the fact that you could add another 780 if needed in the future for more monitors or even 4k whitch would not be the same on 2 mid range cards :) Correct me if i'm wrong Kind regards IndianAccentGenius-
sorry but your stupid , r9 290x its a shit compared to any gtx 780 ti or even any gtx 780
gtx 780 is better then ti bc ti doesnt add much more for 200+ $
Depends which one. I would recommend that you go with EVGA though. They have an amazing customer support.
Convergence87 is right. GPU VRAM does not add up even if you SLI.
comments powered by Disqus