0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 780 vs 1050 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 vs 1050 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780GPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Better PassMark score | 7,976 | vs | 4,443 | Around 80% better PassMark score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | vs | 112.1 GB/s | More than 2.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher texture rate | 165.7 GTexel/s | vs | 58.2 GTexel/s | More than 2.8x higher texture rate | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 192 | vs | 40 | 152 more texture mapping units | |||
Better floating-point performance | 3,977 GFLOPS | vs | 1,862 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 640 | 1664 more shading units | |||
Slightly more memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 2,048 MB | 50% more memory | |||
More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Better particle simulation score | 966.29 mInteraction/s | vs | 658.4 mInteraction/s | More than 45% better particle simulation score | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,971 | vs | 2,863 | Around 40% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher battlefield 4 framerate | 74 | vs | 54 | More than 35% higher battlefield 4 framerate | |||
Wider memory bus | 384 bit | vs | 128 bit | 3x wider memory bus | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 1,354 MHz | vs | 863 MHz | More than 55% higher clock speed | |||
Much higher turbo clock speed | 1,455 MHz | vs | 902 MHz | More than 60% higher turbo clock speed | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,008 MHz | vs | 6,008 MHz | More than 15% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,502 MHz | More than 15% higher memory clock speed | |||
Much lower TDP | 75W | vs | 250W | 3.3x lower TDP |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 vs 1050
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
GeForce GTX 780
7,976
GeForce GTX 1050
4,443
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
255.31 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 1050
215.14 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
57.69 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 1050
67.49 mPixels/s
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
1,928.62 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1050
1,102.04 frames/s
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
966.29 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 1050
658.4 mInteraction/s
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
5.49 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1050
4.45 frames/s
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 780
91.16 frames/s
GeForce GTX 1050
32.65 frames/s
Battlefield 4
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
BKsniperguy (10:10 PM, December 2, 2018)