Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details | GeForce GTX 780 vs 480 |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
6.6 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 42,870 | vs | 20,100 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better 3DMark06 score | 35,080 | vs | 23,824 | More than 45% better 3DMark06 score | |||
Significantly better PassMark score | 7,976 | vs | 4,356 | Around 85% better PassMark score | |||
Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 14,020 | vs | 5,014 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | vs | 182.4 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 3,800 MHz | Around 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better floating-point performance | 3,977 GFLOPS | vs | 1,393 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
Much higher texture rate | 165.7 GTexel/s | vs | 43.56 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
Many more texture mapping units | 192 | vs | 60 | 132 more texture mapping units | |||
Higher clock speed | 863 MHz | vs | 726 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
Many more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 480 | 1824 more shading units | |||
More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 1,536 MB | 2x more memory | |||
Much better particle simulation score | 966.29 mInteraction/s | vs | 303.89 mInteraction/s | Around 3.2x better particle simulation score | |||
Higher pixel rate | 41.4 GPixel/s | vs | 21.78 GPixel/s | More than 90% higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | Around 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,971 | vs | 1,561 | More than 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the EVGA GeForce GTX 480 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780. | |||||||
GeForce GTX 780 | vs | 480 | ||
![]() | 9.3 | 8.4 |
---|
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
GeForce GTX 1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
GeForce GTX 950 vs 750 Ti | ||