Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 780 vs 480 |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780
- 863 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
7.2 Out of 10
by techPowerUp!While the technical aspects of the cooler are certainly nice, it cannot compete with NVIDIA's reference design cooler visually, which is without a doubt the best-looking one in the industry.
VS
Released April, 2010
EVGA GeForce GTX 480
- 726 MHz
- 1.5 GB GDDR5
6.1 Out of 10
by techPowerUp! (Mar, 2010)Please also note that this cooler uses a direct touch heatpipe design that we have first seen on CPU coolers.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780 vs 480 among Desktop GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 42,870 | vs | 20,100 | Around 2.2x better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 35,080 | vs | 23,824 | More than 45% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 7,976 | vs | 4,356 | Around 85% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 14,020 | vs | 5,014 | More than 2.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | vs | 182.4 GB/s | Around 60% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 3,800 MHz | Around 60% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 3,977 GFLOPS | vs | 1,393 GFLOPS | More than 2.8x better floating-point performance | |||
| Much higher texture rate | 165.7 GTexel/s | vs | 43.56 GTexel/s | More than 3.8x higher texture rate | |||
| Many more texture mapping units | 192 | vs | 60 | 132 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher clock speed | 863 MHz | vs | 726 MHz | Around 20% higher clock speed | |||
| Many more shading units | 2,304 | vs | 480 | 1824 more shading units | |||
| More memory | 3,072 MB | vs | 1,536 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| Much better particle simulation score | 966.29 mInteraction/s | vs | 303.89 mInteraction/s | Around 3.2x better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.4 GPixel/s | vs | 21.78 GPixel/s | More than 90% higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 950 MHz | Around 60% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly better PassMark direct compute score | 3,971 | vs | 1,561 | More than 2.5x better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| GPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the EVGA GeForce GTX 480 vs the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780. | |||||||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780 vs 480
PassMark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performanceData courtesy Passmark
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Reviews Word on the street
| GeForce GTX 780 | vs | 480 | ||
 | GeForce GTX 780 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
Read more
Comments
Showing 1 comment.
