Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac based on its .
See full details | GeForce GTX 780M Mac vs 780 Ti |
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
7.2 | Overall Score |
| |
Winner |
| |||||||
Slightly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly lower TDP | 122W | vs | 250W | 2x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 160 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Better floating-point performance | 5,040 GFLOPS | vs | 2,368.5 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
Significantly higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 98.7 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
Higher clock speed | 875 MHz | vs | 771 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
Higher pixel rate | 52.5 GPixel/s | vs | 24.67 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Significantly more texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 128 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 2,201.43 frames/s | vs | 1,002.2 frames/s | Around 2.2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
Significantly more shading units | 2,880 | vs | 1,536 | 1344 more shading units | |||
Higher turbo clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed |
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
980 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
780 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 290X vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
TITAN vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 780 Ti | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$267 | ||
RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||