Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M Mac based on its .
See full details GeForce GTX 780M Mac vs 780 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M Mac vs 780 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower TDP | 122W | vs | 250W | 2x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 336 GB/s | vs | 160 GB/s | More than 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 7,000 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | 40% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 5,040 GFLOPS | vs | 2,368.5 GFLOPS | Around 2.2x better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 210 GTexel/s | vs | 98.7 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| Higher clock speed | 875 MHz | vs | 771 MHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 52.5 GPixel/s | vs | 24.67 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 240 | vs | 128 | 112 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly better ocean surface simulation score | 2,201.43 frames/s | vs | 1,002.2 frames/s | Around 2.2x better ocean surface simulation score | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 2,880 | vs | 1,536 | 1344 more shading units | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 1,020 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 30% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,752 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M Mac vs 780 Ti
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 980 vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 780 vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| TITAN vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| TITAN BLACK vs 780 Ti | ||
 | VS | |
| 690 vs 780 Ti | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
