GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 680 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 2,048 MB 2x more memory
Significantly lower TDP 100W vs 195W Around 50% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 680

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680

Report a correction
Higher clock speed 1,006 MHz vs 771 MHz More than 30% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 26,525.5 vs 23,381.5 Around 15% better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 5,709 vs 4,070 More than 40% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 33,025 vs 27,258 More than 20% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Much better CLBenchmark raytrace score 176,118 vs 126,734 Around 40% better CLBenchmark raytrace score
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Slightly better 3DMark 11 graphics score 9,861 vs 7,776.5 More than 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher memory bandwidth 192.3 GB/s vs 160 GB/s More than 20% higher memory bandwidth
Higher turbo clock speed 1,058 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 35% higher turbo clock speed
Slightly better floating-point performance 3,090.4 GFLOPS vs 2,368.5 GFLOPS More than 30% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 128.8 GTexel/s vs 98.7 GTexel/s More than 30% higher texture rate
Higher dead space 3 framerate 184 fps vs 143.9 fps Around 30% higher dead space 3 framerate
Higher BioShock infinite framerate 64.7 fps vs 46.6 fps Around 40% higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Higher crysis 3 framerate 36.8 fps vs 29.25 fps More than 25% higher crysis 3 framerate
Better fire strike factor score 60.8 vs 53.87 Around 15% better fire strike factor score
Higher FarCry 3 framerate 37.6 vs 30.4 Around 25% higher FarCry 3 framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,905 vs 2,202 More than 30% better PassMark direct compute score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 680

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
81.78 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680
92.96 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
35.82 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680
42.25 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
3,060.34
GeForce GTX 680
3,360.69

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
3,715.82
GeForce GTX 680
3,719.44

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

Showing 1 comment.
i get 60+ fps on bioshock infinite on maximum settings with my 780m gtx
comments powered by Disqus