GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 680M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

6.6

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 23,381.5 vs 5,897.5 Around 4x better 3DMark06 score
Better PassMark score 4,043 vs 3,377 Around 20% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score 27,258 vs 20,891 More than 30% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Higher effective memory clock speed 5,000 MHz vs 3,600 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher memory bandwidth 160 GB/s vs 115.2 GB/s Around 40% higher memory bandwidth
Much higher diablo III framerate 186.1 fps vs 157.25 fps Around 20% higher diablo III framerate
Much higher crysis 3 framerate 29.25 fps vs 21.8 fps Around 35% higher crysis 3 framerate
Slightly better floating-point performance 2,448 GFLOPS vs 1,932.7 GFLOPS More than 25% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 102 GTexel/s vs 80.5 GTexel/s More than 25% higher texture rate
Significantly higher memory clock speed 1,250 MHz vs 900 MHz Around 40% higher memory clock speed
Higher turbo clock speed 797 MHz vs 719 MHz More than 10% higher turbo clock speed
More texture mapping units 128 vs 112 16 more texture mapping units
Better face detection score 35.82 mPixels/s vs 28.08 mPixels/s Around 30% better face detection score
Better PassMark direct compute score 2,247 vs 1,775 More than 25% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher metro: last light framerate 37 vs 30.5 More than 20% higher metro: last light framerate
Slightly more shading units 1,536 vs 1,344 192 more shading units
Better fire strike factor score 53.72 vs 40.62 More than 30% better fire strike factor score
Front view of GeForce GTX 680M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 680M

Report a correction
Much better T-Rex score 3,356.7 vs 3,060.34 Around 10% better T-Rex score
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score 22,760 vs 7,776.5 Around 3x better 3DMark 11 graphics score

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 680M

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
81.78 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 680M
99.75 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
35.82 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 680M
28.08 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus