Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 780M vs 770M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
- 771 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
7.1 Out of 10
by Slobodan-Simic (May, 2013)It will work at 823MHz+ GPU clock and feasture 4GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 5GHz and paired up with a 256-bit memory interface that add up to 160GB/s of memory bandwidth.
VS
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
- 706 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
6.8 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2013)We aren’t picking up a ton of performance from memory bandwidth as far as we can tell, but it does pay off and is worth pursuing, even with the GTX 770’s base memory clock of 7GHz.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 770M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher dead space 3 framerate | 143.9 fps | vs | 93 fps | Around 55% higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 27,258 | vs | 18,137.5 | More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,043 | vs | 2,638 | Around 55% better PassMark score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | vs | 96.2 GB/s | More than 65% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 2,448 GFLOPS | vs | 1,355.5 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher texture rate | 102 GTexel/s | vs | 56.5 GTexel/s | More than 80% higher texture rate | |||
| Much higher diablo III framerate | 186.1 fps | vs | 141.3 fps | More than 30% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,776.5 | vs | 4,955 | More than 55% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 771 MHz | vs | 706 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,000 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| More texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 25.5 GPixel/s | vs | 14.12 GPixel/s | More than 80% higher pixel rate | |||
| More shading units | 1,536 | vs | 960 | 576 more shading units | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 53.72 | vs | 33.11 | More than 60% better fire strike factor score | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | Around 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Higher metro: last light framerate | 37 | vs | 23 | More than 60% higher metro: last light framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 46.6 fps | vs | 29.43 fps | Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 3.5 frames/s | vs | 2.48 frames/s | More than 40% better T-Rex score | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 29.25 fps | vs | 19.55 fps | Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 2,247 | vs | 1,486 | More than 50% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| |||||||
| Better T-Rex score | 3,390.08 | vs | 3,060.34 | More than 10% better T-Rex score | |||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 770M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 4 laptops with the GeForce GTX 780M, starting from $2,189
- 3 laptops with the GeForce GTX 770M, starting from $1,700
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 960M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 860M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 765M vs 770M | ||
 | VS |  |
| 880M vs 780M | ||
| | VS | |
| 960M vs 780M | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 M290X vs 780M | ||
 | VS | |
| 970M vs 780M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs RX Vega 64 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 1050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $316 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $316 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 1080 Ti vs 1080 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 6 comments.
