Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M based on its gaming.
See full details GeForce GTX 780M vs 770M |
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M
- 771 MHz
- 4 GB GDDR5
8.6 Out of 10
by Slobodan-Simic (May, 2013)The GTX 765M is also based on the 28nm GK106 Kepler GPU but features 768 CUDA cores and works at 850MHz+ GPU clock and comes with 2GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 4GHz and paired up with a 128-bit memory interface for 64GB/s of memory bandwidth.
VS
Released May, 2013
Nvidia GeForce GTX 770M
- 706 MHz
- 3 GB GDDR5
7.6 Out of 10
by Ryan-Smith (May, 2013)We aren’t picking up a ton of performance from memory bandwidth as far as we can tell, but it does pay off and is worth pursuing, even with the GTX 770’s base memory clock of 7GHz.
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 770M
Gaming | |
Real world tests using the latest 3D games | |
| BioShock Infinite, Crysis 3, Dead Space 3, Diablo III and 1 more | |
Benchmarks | |
Synthetic tests to measure overall performance | |
| Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06 | |
Compute Performance | |
General computing tests executed on the GPU | |
| Passmark Direct Compute | |
GPUBoss Score | |
Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better passmark score | 4,269 | vs | 2,756 | Around 55% better passmark score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 27,258 | vs | 18,137.5 | More than 50% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly better floating-point performance | 2,369 GFLOPS | vs | 1,356 GFLOPS | Around 75% better floating-point performance | |||
| Significantly higher texture rate | 98.7 GTexel/s | vs | 56.5 GTexel/s | Around 75% higher texture rate | |||
| More memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
| Higher clock speed | 771 MHz | vs | 706 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 24.7 GPixel/s | vs | 14.1 GPixel/s | More than 75% higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 5,000 MHz | vs | 4,008 MHz | Around 25% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 7,776.5 | vs | 4,955 | More than 55% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Significantly more texture mapping units | 128 | vs | 80 | 48 more texture mapping units | |||
| Significantly more shading units | 1,536 | vs | 960 | 576 more shading units | |||
| Significantly higher dead space 3 framerate | 143.9 fps | vs | 93 fps | Around 55% higher dead space 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 24 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher memory clock speed | 1,250 MHz | vs | 1,002 MHz | Around 25% higher memory clock speed | |||
| Higher diablo III framerate | 186.1 fps | vs | 141.3 fps | More than 30% higher diablo III framerate | |||
| Wider memory bus | 256 bit | vs | 192 bit | Around 35% wider memory bus | |||
| Higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate | 119.35 fps | vs | 91.4 fps | More than 30% higher call of duty: modern warfare 3 framerate | |||
| Better passmark direct compute score | 2,190 | vs | 1,447 | More than 50% better passmark direct compute score | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 29.25 fps | vs | 19.55 fps | Around 50% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 46.6 fps | vs | 29.43 fps | Around 60% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Lower TDP | 75W | vs | 100W | 25% lower TDP | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 770M
Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance
3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance
BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)
Crysis 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset + 16xAF + 2xSMAA
Dead Space 3 1920 x 1080 - Very High preset
Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 860M vs 770M | ||
 | VS | |
| 870M vs 770M | ||
 | VS |  |
| R9 M290X vs 780M | ||
| | VS | |
| 860M vs 780M | ||
 | VS | |
| 880M vs 780M | ||
 | VS | |
| 970M vs 780M | ||
| | VS | |
| 870M vs 780M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 760 | ||
 | VS | |
| 980 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs R9 280X | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 780 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 960 vs 770 | ||
Read more
Comments
Showing 5 comments.
