GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 780 among all GPUs

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

7.1

Overall Score

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780  based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M

Report a correction
Slightly more memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Significantly lower TDP 100W vs 250W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 780

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

Report a correction
Much better 3DMark06 score 35,080 vs 23,381.5 More than 50% better 3DMark06 score
Significantly better PassMark score 7,976 vs 4,043 More than 95% better PassMark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 42,870 vs 27,258 More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly higher memory bandwidth 288.4 GB/s vs 160 GB/s More than 80% higher memory bandwidth
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,020 vs 7,776.5 More than 80% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 863 MHz vs 771 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 3,977 GFLOPS vs 2,448 GFLOPS More than 60% better floating-point performance
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher texture rate 165.7 GTexel/s vs 102 GTexel/s More than 60% higher texture rate
Significantly better particle simulation score 966.29 mInteraction/s vs 335.76 mInteraction/s Around 3x better particle simulation score
Higher pixel rate 41.4 GPixel/s vs 25.5 GPixel/s More than 60% higher pixel rate
More texture mapping units 192 vs 128 64 more texture mapping units
More shading units 2,304 vs 1,536 768 more shading units
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 95.3 fps vs 46.6 fps More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Better PassMark direct compute score 3,971 vs 2,247 More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score
Higher turbo clock speed 902 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
Higher FarCry 3 framerate 46 vs 30.4 More than 50% higher FarCry 3 framerate
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 780

Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
81.78 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 780
255.31 mHash/s

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
35.82 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 780
57.69 mPixels/s

Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
1,140.88 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
1,928.62 frames/s

Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
335.76 mInteraction/s
GeForce GTX 780
966.29 mInteraction/s

T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
3.63 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
5.49 frames/s

Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 780M
62.49 frames/s
GeForce GTX 780
91.16 frames/s

Battlefield 4

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus