GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 780

Gaming

Real world tests using the latest 3D games

BioShock Infinite

Benchmarks

Synthetic tests to measure overall performance

Passmark, 3DMark 11 Graphics, 3DMark Vantage Graphics and 3DMark06

Compute Performance

General computing tests executed on the GPU

Passmark Direct Compute and CLBenchmark Raytrace

GPUBoss Score

Gaming, Benchmarks and Compute Performance

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780  based on its benchmarks and compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 780M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780M

Report a correction
More memory 4,096 MB vs 3,072 MB Around 35% more memory
Significantly lower TDP 100W vs 250W 2.5x lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 780

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780

Report a correction
Significantly better passmark score 8,051 vs 4,329 More than 85% better passmark score
Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score 42,870 vs 27,258 More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score
Significantly better 3DMark06 score 35,080 vs 23,381.5 More than 50% better 3DMark06 score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 14,020 vs 7,776.5 More than 80% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Higher clock speed 863 MHz vs 771 MHz More than 10% higher clock speed
Better floating-point performance 3,977 GFLOPS vs 2,369 GFLOPS Around 70% better floating-point performance
Higher texture rate 166.4 GTexel/s vs 98.7 GTexel/s Around 70% higher texture rate
Higher effective memory clock speed 6,008 MHz vs 5,000 MHz More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed
Higher pixel rate 41.4 GPixel/s vs 24.7 GPixel/s Around 70% higher pixel rate
Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate 95.3 fps vs 46.6 fps More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate
Higher turbo clock speed 902 MHz vs 797 MHz Around 15% higher turbo clock speed
More texture mapping units 192 vs 128 64 more texture mapping units
Significantly better CLBenchmark raytrace score 252,908 vs 126,734 Around 2x better CLBenchmark raytrace score
More render output processors 48 vs 32 16 more render output processors
More shading units 2,304 vs 1,536 768 more shading units
Significantly better passmark direct compute score 3,989 vs 2,206 More than 80% better passmark direct compute score
Higher memory clock speed 1,502 MHz vs 1,250 MHz More than 20% higher memory clock speed
Wider memory bus 384 bit vs 256 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 780

Passmark Industry standard benchmark for overall graphics card performance

I thought it might also be interesting to run the new 3DMark on these GPUs and the results show a similar story to the gaming tests on the previous page.
GeForce GTX 780M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

3DMark 11 Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 11 GPU performance

3DMark Vantage Graphics Industry standard benchmark that tests DirectX 10 GPU performance

BioShock Infinite 1920 x 1080 - Ultra preset + DX11 (DDOF)

GeForce GTX 780M
46.6 fps
GeForce GTX 780
95.3 fps
Being able to play top titles like Metro Last Light, Bioshock Infinite and Sleeping Dogs at these quality settings and at 1920x1080 resolution was impressive.
GeForce GTX 780M | by Ryan-Shrout (Jun, 2013)

Passmark Direct Compute Measures performance of general-purpose computing using Microsoft DirectCompute

CLBenchmark Raytrace Measures compute performance using OpenCL to do raytracing

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus