Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 780
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 780 based on its gaming, benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 780M vs 780 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 780M vs 780 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 7.1 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
| |  | Nvidia GeForce GTX 780GPUBoss Winner |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Slightly more memory | 4,096 MB | vs | 3,072 MB | Around 35% more memory | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly lower TDP | 100W | vs | 250W | 2.5x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 35,080 | vs | 23,381.5 | More than 50% better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Significantly better PassMark score | 7,976 | vs | 4,043 | More than 95% better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 42,870 | vs | 27,258 | More than 55% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 288.4 GB/s | vs | 160 GB/s | More than 80% higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 14,020 | vs | 7,776.5 | More than 80% better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 863 MHz | vs | 771 MHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Better floating-point performance | 3,977 GFLOPS | vs | 2,448 GFLOPS | More than 60% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 6,008 MHz | vs | 5,000 MHz | More than 20% higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher texture rate | 165.7 GTexel/s | vs | 102 GTexel/s | More than 60% higher texture rate | |||
| Significantly better particle simulation score | 966.29 mInteraction/s | vs | 335.76 mInteraction/s | Around 3x better particle simulation score | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 41.4 GPixel/s | vs | 25.5 GPixel/s | More than 60% higher pixel rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 192 | vs | 128 | 64 more texture mapping units | |||
| More shading units | 2,304 | vs | 1,536 | 768 more shading units | |||
| More render output processors | 48 | vs | 32 | 16 more render output processors | |||
| Significantly higher BioShock infinite framerate | 95.3 fps | vs | 46.6 fps | More than 2x higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 3,971 | vs | 2,247 | More than 75% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher turbo clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 797 MHz | Around 15% higher turbo clock speed | |||
| Higher FarCry 3 framerate | 46 | vs | 30.4 | More than 50% higher FarCry 3 framerate | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,502 MHz | vs | 1,250 MHz | More than 20% higher memory clock speed | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 780M vs 780
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
Ocean surface simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
Particle simulation Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (Compubench 1.5) Data courtesy CompuBench
Video composition Data courtesy CompuBench
Battlefield 4
FarCry 3
Systems
Looking for a system?
- 4 laptops with the GeForce GTX 780M, starting from $2,157
- 4 desktops with the GeForce GTX 780, starting from $2,079
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 970 vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| 770 vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290X vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| 780 Ti vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| 960 vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| 980 vs 780 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 290 vs 780 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $267 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| RX 580 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| $267 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| 1050 Ti vs 960 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
