Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 850M vs 550 Ti |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 550 Ti among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.2 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark06 score | 4,385.5 | vs | 2,272 | Around 95% better 3DMark06 score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 14,358.5 | vs | 9,923 | Around 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Slightly more memory | 2,048 MB | vs | 1,024 MB | 2x more memory | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 192 | 448 more shading units | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 26.99 | vs | 17.07 | Around 60% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.43 frames/s | vs | 1.06 frames/s | More than 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| Slightly better PassMark direct compute score | 1,215 | vs | 822 | Around 50% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 116W | 2.6x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,104 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | More than 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 98.5 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | More than 3x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Much higher battlefield 3 framerate | 47 | vs | 22 | Around 2.2x higher battlefield 3 framerate | |||
| More render output processors | 24 | vs | 16 | 8 more render output processors | |||
| Slightly better manhattan score | 3,350.43 | vs | 1,764.49 | Around 90% better manhattan score | |||
Report a correction
