Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 660
GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 660 based on its benchmarks and compute performance.
See full details GeForce GTX 850M vs 660 |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 660 among all GPUs
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Cloud Gate Factor, Sky Diver Factor and 1 more | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 32 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
| 6.9 | Overall Score |
| | |
 | Winner |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,135 | vs | 6,850 | More than 2.2x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 823 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Lower TDP | 45W | vs | 130W | 2.9x lower TDP | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 18,060 | vs | 4,385.5 | More than 4x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 4,121 | vs | 1,499 | Around 2.8x better PassMark score | |||
| Significantly higher effective memory clock speed | 5,600 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | More than 2.8x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher memory bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | More than 5.5x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 25,130 | vs | 14,358.5 | More than 75% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 12,983.16 | vs | 1,764.49 | More than 7.2x better manhattan score | |||
| Much higher FarCry 3 framerate | 80 | vs | 16.4 | Around 5x higher FarCry 3 framerate | |||
| Higher texture rate | 79 GTexel/s | vs | 36.1 GTexel/s | Around 2.2x higher texture rate | |||
| More texture mapping units | 96 | vs | 40 | 56 more texture mapping units | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,896.2 GFLOPS | vs | 1,154.6 GFLOPS | Around 65% better floating-point performance | |||
| More render output processors | 32 | vs | 16 | Twice as many render output processors | |||
| Better fire strike factor score | 44.27 | vs | 26.99 | Around 65% better fire strike factor score | |||
| Higher memory clock speed | 1,400 MHz | vs | 1,001 MHz | Around 40% higher memory clock speed | |||
| More shading units | 1,152 | vs | 640 | 512 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,948 | vs | 1,215 | More than 60% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 660
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Bioshock Infinite
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 850M vs 860M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 750M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 850M vs 840M | ||
 | VS |  |
| $264 | ||
| 660 vs 940MX | ||
| | VS |  |
| $264 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $264 | $363 | |
| 660 vs 750 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $264 | ||
| 660 vs 1050 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS | |
| $370 | ||
| 1060 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| $370 | ||
| 1060 vs RX 580 | ||
 | VS | |
| $370 | ||
| 970 vs 1060 | ||
| | VS | |
| 970 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs 960 | ||
| | VS | |
| 960 vs 1050 Ti | ||
| | VS | |
| $363 | ||
| 750 Ti vs 960 | ||
