0 Comments
| GeForce GTX 850M vs 660M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 660M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more |
Graphics | |
| |
T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor |
Computing | |
| |
Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more |
Performance per Watt | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Value | |
| |
Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more |
Noise and Power | |
| |
TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850MGPUBoss Winner | ![]() | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,135 | vs | 2,369 | More than 6.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 14,358.5 | vs | 9,803 | More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
Higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 835 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,154.6 GFLOPS | vs | 641.3 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
Higher pixel rate | 14.43 GPixel/s | vs | 6.68 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
Higher crysis 3 framerate | 14 fps | vs | 10 fps | 40% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
Better T-Rex score | 2.43 frames/s | vs | 1.1 frames/s | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,215 | vs | 739 | Around 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 28.4 | vs | 22.9 | Around 25% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 28.4 fps | vs | 22.9 fps | Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
Much better 3DMark06 score | 14,704 | vs | 4,385.5 | More than 3.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
Much better manhattan score | 3,709.34 | vs | 1,764.49 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
Higher diablo III framerate | 67 fps | vs | 61 fps | Around 10% higher diablo III framerate |
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 660M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 850M
150.96 mHash/s
GeForce GTX 660M
33.75 mHash/s
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 850M
37.72 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 660M
10.84 mPixels/s
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 850M
2,606.42
GeForce GTX 660M
3,353.58
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
GeForce GTX 850M
1,764.49
GeForce GTX 660M
3,709.34
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 850M
26.99
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
GeForce GTX 850M
225.07
GeForce GTX 660M
149.18
Thief
GeForce GTX 850M
18.4
Battlefield 4
GeForce GTX 850M
20.4
GeForce GTX 660M
35.45
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 7 laptops with the GeForce GTX 850M, starting from $800
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 660M, starting from $1,000
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
860M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
750M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
840M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
950M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
760M vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 M265X vs 850M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
765M vs 850M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
960 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$304 | ||
1060 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 380 vs 960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
R9 390 vs 970 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
970 vs R9 290X | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$274 | ||
960 vs 750 Ti | ||