GeForce GTX 850M vs 660M |
VS
GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 660M among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP
Gaming | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more | |
Graphics | |
| | |
| T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor | |
Computing | |
| | |
| Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Value | |
| | |
| Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more | |
Noise and Power | |
| | |
| TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?
VS
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850MGPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark 11 graphics score | 16,135 | vs | 2,369 | More than 6.8x better 3DMark 11 graphics score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Better 3DMark vantage graphics score | 14,358.5 | vs | 9,803 | More than 45% better 3DMark vantage graphics score | |||
| Higher clock speed | 902 MHz | vs | 835 MHz | Around 10% higher clock speed | |||
| Slightly better floating-point performance | 1,154.6 GFLOPS | vs | 641.3 GFLOPS | More than 80% better floating-point performance | |||
| Higher pixel rate | 14.43 GPixel/s | vs | 6.68 GPixel/s | Around 2.2x higher pixel rate | |||
| Higher crysis 3 framerate | 14 fps | vs | 10 fps | 40% higher crysis 3 framerate | |||
| Better T-Rex score | 2.43 frames/s | vs | 1.1 frames/s | Around 2.2x better T-Rex score | |||
| More shading units | 640 | vs | 384 | 256 more shading units | |||
| Better PassMark direct compute score | 1,215 | vs | 739 | Around 65% better PassMark direct compute score | |||
| Higher bioshock infinite framerate | 28.4 | vs | 22.9 | Around 25% higher bioshock infinite framerate | |||
| Higher BioShock infinite framerate | 28.4 fps | vs | 22.9 fps | Around 25% higher BioShock infinite framerate | |||
| |||||||
| Much better 3DMark06 score | 14,704 | vs | 4,385.5 | More than 3.2x better 3DMark06 score | |||
| Higher effective memory clock speed | 4,000 MHz | vs | 2,002 MHz | Around 2x higher effective memory clock speed | |||
| Much better manhattan score | 3,709.34 | vs | 1,764.49 | More than 2x better manhattan score | |||
| Higher memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | vs | 32 GB/s | 2x higher memory bandwidth | |||
| Higher diablo III framerate | 67 fps | vs | 61 fps | Around 10% higher diablo III framerate | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 660M
Bitcoin mining Data courtesy CompuBench
Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench
T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench
Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark
Thief
Battlefield 4
Laptops
Looking for a laptop?
- 7 laptops with the GeForce GTX 850M, starting from $800
- 2 laptops with the GeForce GTX 660M, starting from $1,000
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 860M vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| 750M vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| 840M vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| 950M vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| 760M vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 M265X vs 850M | ||
 | VS | |
| 765M vs 850M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $304 | ||
| 1050 Ti vs 1060 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 960 vs 970 | ||
| | VS | |
| $304 | ||
| 1060 vs 970 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 380 vs 960 | ||
 | VS | |
| R9 390 vs 970 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 970 vs R9 290X | ||
| | VS |  |
| $274 | ||
| 960 vs 750 Ti | ||
