GPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 850M vs 670MX among Laptop GPUs over 35W TDP

Gaming

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 21 more

Graphics

T-Rex, Manhattan, Sky Diver Factor and Fire Strike Factor

Computing

Face Detection, Ocean Surface Simulation and 3 more

Performance per Watt

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Value

Battlefield 3, Battlefield 4, Bioshock Infinite and 31 more

Noise and Power

TDP, Idle Power Consumption, Load Power Consumption and 2 more

Winner
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M 

GPUBoss recommends the Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M  based on its compute performance.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with GPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of GeForce GTX 850M

Reasons to consider the
Nvidia GeForce GTX 850M

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 902 MHz vs 601 MHz More than 50% higher clock speed
Better 3DMark06 score 4,385.5 vs 3,587 More than 20% better 3DMark06 score
Better face detection score 37.72 mPixels/s vs 20.83 mPixels/s More than 80% better face detection score
Higher memory clock speed 1,001 MHz vs 700 MHz Around 45% higher memory clock speed
Slightly higher battlefield 4 framerate 20.4 vs 18.6 Around 10% higher battlefield 4 framerate
Lower TDP 45W vs 75W 40% lower TDP
Front view of GeForce GTX 670MX

Reasons to consider the
Generic GeForce GTX 670MX

Report a correction
Better PassMark score 2,053 vs 1,499 More than 35% better PassMark score
Better 3DMark 11 graphics score 20,268 vs 16,135 More than 25% better 3DMark 11 graphics score
Much better manhattan score 3,720.84 vs 1,764.49 More than 2x better manhattan score
More memory 3,072 MB vs 2,048 MB 50% more memory
Higher memory bandwidth 67.2 GB/s vs 32 GB/s More than 2x higher memory bandwidth
Much higher diablo III framerate 89.5 fps vs 61 fps More than 45% higher diablo III framerate
Higher effective memory clock speed 2,800 MHz vs 2,002 MHz Around 40% higher effective memory clock speed
More texture mapping units 80 vs 40 Twice as many texture mapping units
More shading units 960 vs 640 320 more shading units
More render output processors 24 vs 16 8 more render output processors
Wider memory bus 192 bit vs 128 bit 50% wider memory bus

Benchmarks Real world tests of GeForce GTX 850M vs 670MX

Face detection Data courtesy CompuBench

GeForce GTX 850M
37.72 mPixels/s
GeForce GTX 670MX
20.83 mPixels/s

T-Rex (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Manhattan (GFXBench 3.0) Data courtesy CompuBench

Fire Strike Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Sky Diver Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Cloud Gate Factor Data courtesy FutureMark

Battlefield 4

Comments

comments powered by Disqus